Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25940276›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2015

Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.

Ann E Cleves, Ajay N Jain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cosolvent Sites-Based Discovery ofJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. 5-Marine drugs · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Biased Docking for Protein-Ligand Pose Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  13. DUBS: A Framework for DevelopingJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Practical Model Selection for Prospective Virtual Screening.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ann E ClevesHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ajay N Jain

Funding

Machine Learning in Chemistry and BiologyR01GM070481 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JAIN, AJAY N · 2005 to 2013
$2.5M
Binding-Site Modeling with Multiple-Instance Machine-LearningR01GM101689 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JAIN, AJAY N · 2013 to 2020
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM070481NIGMS NIH HHS GM101689NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070481NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prediction of the bound configuration of small-molecule ligands that differ substantially from the cognate ligand of a protein co-crystal structure is much more challenging than re-docking the cognate ligand. Success rates for cross-docking in the range of 20-30 % are common. We present an approach that uses structural information known prior to a particular cutoff-date to make predictions on ligands whose bounds structures were determined later. The knowledge-guided docking protocol was tested on a set of ten protein targets using a total of 949 ligands. The benchmark data set, called PINC ("PINC Is Not Cognate"), is publicly available. Protein pocket similarity was used to choose representative structures for ensemble-docking. The docking protocol made use of known ligand poses prior to the cutoff-date, both to help guide the configurational search and to adjust the rank of predicted poses. Overall, the top-scoring pose family was correct over 60 % of the time, with the top-two pose families approaching a 75 % success rate. Correct poses among all those predicted were identified nearly 90 % of the time. The largest improvements came from the use of molecular similarity to improve ligand pose rankings and the strategy for identifying representative protein structures. With the exception of a single outlier target, the knowledge-guided docking protocol produced results matching the quality of cognate-ligand re-docking, but it did so on a very challenging temporally-segregated cross-docking benchmark.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBinding SitesCrystallography, X-RayCyclin-Dependent Kinase 2Databases, ProteinHIV Reverse TranscriptaseHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsLigandsMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 14Models, MolecularMolecular Docking SimulationPPAR gammaProtein BindingProteinsSmall Molecule LibrariesThrombinCyclin-Dependent Kinase 2HIV Reverse TranscriptaseHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsLigandsMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 14PPAR gammaProteinsreverse transcriptase, Human immunodeficiency virus 1Small Molecule LibrariesThrombin

Identifiers

PMID25940276
PMCPMC4464052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.