Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25940194›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2015

Optimizing insecticide allocation strategies based on houses and livestock shelters for visceral leishmaniasis control in Bihar, India.

Kaushik K Gorahava, Jay M Rosenberger, Anuj Mubayi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaushik K GorahavaIndustrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering Department, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas; Department of Mathematics, Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Mathematics, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas; SAL Mathematical Computational and Modeling Science Center, Tempe, Arizona; School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona kaushik.gorahava@mavs.uta.edu amubayi@asu.edu.
Jay M RosenbergerIndustrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering Department, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas; Department of Mathematics, Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Mathematics, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas; SAL Mathematical Computational and Modeling Science Center, Tempe, Arizona; School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona.
Anuj MubayiIndustrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering Department, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas; Department of Mathematics, Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Mathematics, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas; SAL Mathematical Computational and Modeling Science Center, Tempe, Arizona; School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona kaushik.gorahava@mavs.uta.edu amubayi@asu.edu.
The University of Texas at Arlington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is the most deadly form of the leishmaniasis family of diseases, which affects numerous developing countries. The Indian state of Bihar has the highest prevalence and mortality rate of VL in the world. Insecticide spraying is believed to be an effective vector control program for controlling the spread of VL in Bihar; however, it is expensive and less effective if not implemented systematically. This study develops and analyzes a novel optimization model for VL control in Bihar that identifies an optimal (best possible) allocation of chosen insecticide (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane [DDT] or deltamethrin) based on the sizes of human and cattle populations in the region. The model maximizes the insecticide-induced sandfly death rate in human and cattle dwellings while staying within the current state budget for VL vector control efforts. The model results suggest that deltamethrin might not be a good replacement for DDT because the insecticide-induced sandfly deaths are 3.72 times more in case of DDT even after 90 days post spray. Different insecticide allocation strategies between the two types of sites (houses and cattle sheds) are suggested based on the state VL-control budget and have a direct implication on VL elimination efforts in a resource-limited region.

Indexed as

HousingHousing, AnimalInsect VectorsPsychodidaeAnimalsCattleComputer SimulationDDTHumansIndiaInsect ControlInsecticidesLeishmaniasis, VisceralNitrilesPyrethrinsResource AllocationDDTdecamethrinInsecticidesNitrilesPyrethrins

Identifiers

PMID25940194
PMCPMC4497882
OpenAlexW2248206124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.