Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25940098›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2015

Intraparietal regions play a material general role in working memory: Evidence supporting an internal attentional role.

Kyle Killebrew, Ryan Mruczek, Marian E Berryhill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kyle KillebrewUniversity of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Ryan MruczekUniversity of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA; Worcester State University, Worcester, MA 01602, USA.
Marian E BerryhillUniversity of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA. Electronic address: mberryhill@unr.edu.

Funding

Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality CoreP20GM103650 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI WEBSTER, MICHAEL A · 2012 to 2022
$20.9M
Investigating Working Memory Encoding using Frequency-Tagging of Evoked ResponseR15EY022775 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI BERRYHILL, MARIAN E, CAPLOVITZ, GIDEON PAUL · 2012 to 2012
$407k
NEI NIH HHS NEIR15EY022775NEI NIH HHS R15 EY022775NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103650PHS HHS NIGMS1P20GM103650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining the role of intraparietal sulcus (IPS) regions in working memory (WM) remains a topic of considerable interest and lack of clarity. One group of hypotheses, the internal attention view, proposes that the IPS plays a material general role in maintaining information in WM. An alternative viewpoint, the pure storage account, proposes that the IPS in each hemisphere maintains material specific (e.g., left--phonological; right--visuospatial) information. Yet, adjudication between competing theoretical perspectives is complicated by divergent findings from different methodologies and their use of different paradigms, perhaps most notably between functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG). For example, fMRI studies typically use full field stimulus presentations and report bilateral IPS activation, whereas EEG studies direct attention to a single hemifield and report a contralateral bias in both hemispheres. Here, we addressed this question by applying a regions-of-interest fMRI approach to elucidate IPS contributions to WM. Importantly, we manipulated stimulus type (verbal, visuospatial) and the cued hemifield to assess the degree to which IPS activations reflect stimulus specific or stimulus general processing consistent with the pure storage or internal attention hypotheses. These data revealed significant contralateral bias along regions IPS0-5 regardless of stimulus type. Also present was a weaker stimulus-based bias apparent in stronger left lateralized activations for verbal stimuli and stronger right lateralized activations for visuospatial stimuli. However, there was no consistent stimulus-based lateralization of activity. Thus, despite the observation of stimulus-based modulation of spatial lateralization this pattern was bilateral. As such, although it is quantitatively underspecified, our results are overall more consistent with an internal attention view that the IPS plays a material general role in refreshing the contents of WM.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionBrain MappingCerebrovascular CirculationFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory, Short-TermMiddle AgedModels, NeurologicalModels, PsychologicalNeuropsychological TestsOxygenParietal LobePhysical StimulationOxygen

Identifiers

PMID25940098
PMCPMC4468015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.