Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25939727›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2015

Procedural validity of the AUDADIS-5 depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder modules: Substance abusers and others in the general population.

Deborah S Hasin, Dvora Shmulewitz, Malka Stohl, Eliana Greenstein, Christina Aivadyan, Kara Morita, Tulshi Saha, Efrat Aharonovich, Jeesun Jung, Haitao Zhang and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Deborah S HasinDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA. Electronic address: deborah.hasin@gmail.com.
Dvora ShmulewitzDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Malka StohlNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Eliana GreensteinNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Christina AivadyanNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Kara MoritaNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Tulshi SahaLaboratory of Epidemiology and Biometry, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Efrat AharonovichDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Jeesun JungLaboratory of Epidemiology and Biometry, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Haitao ZhangLaboratory of Epidemiology and Biometry, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Edward V NunesDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Bridget F GrantLaboratory of Epidemiology and Biometry, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
New York State Psychiatric InstituteNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism · USColumbia University · US

Funding

National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) - IIIZIAAA000449 · NIAAA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM · PI GRANT, BRIDGET F · 2009 to 2016
$16.5M
Drug Abuse Treatment Development and Research MentoringK24DA022412 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI NUNES, EDWARD V. · 2007 to 2016
$1.7M
Epidemiologic Studies of Alcohol Use Disorders (ongoing)K05AA014223 · NIAAA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HASIN, DEBORAH S · 2003 to 2012
$1.5M
NIAAA NIH HHS K05 AA014223NIAAA NIH HHS K05AA014223NICHD NIH HHS HHSN275200900007CNIDA NIH HHS K24 DA022412NIDA NIH HHS K24DA022412PHS HHS HHSN275200900007C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the procedural validity of lay-administered, fully-structured assessments of depressive, anxiety and post-traumatic stress (PTSD) disorders in the general population as determined by comparison with clinical re-appraisal, and whether this differs between current regular substance abusers and others. We evaluated the procedural validity of the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule, DSM-5 Version (AUDADIS-5) assessment of these disorders through clinician re-interviews.

methodsTest-retest design among respondents from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III (NESARC-III): (264 current regular substance abusers, 447 others). Clinicians blinded to AUDADIS-5 results administered the semi-structured Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders, DSM-5 version (PRISM-5). AUDADIS-5/PRISM-5 concordance was indicated by kappa (κ) for diagnoses and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for dimensional measures (DSM-5 symptom or criterion counts). Results were compared between current regular substance abusers and others.

resultsAUDADIS-5 and PRISM-5 concordance for DSM-5 depressive disorders, anxiety disorders and PTSD was generally fair to moderate (κ=0.24-0.59), with concordance on dimensional scales much better (ICC=0.53-0.81). Concordance differed little between regular substance abusers and others.

conclusionsAUDADIS-5/PRISM-5 concordance indicated procedural validity for the AUDADIS-5 among substance abusers and others, suggesting that AUDADIS-5 diagnoses of DSM-5 depressive, anxiety and PTSD diagnoses are informative measures in both groups in epidemiological studies. The stronger concordance on dimensional measures supports the current movement toward dimensional psychopathology measures, suggesting that such measures provide important information for research in the NESARC-III and other datasets, and possibly for clinical purposes as well.

Indexed as

AdultAnxiety DisordersDepressive DisorderDrug UsersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticAlcohol use disorderAlcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-5Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders-5ReliabilitySubstance use disorderValidity

Identifiers

PMID25939727
PMCPMC5089368
OpenAlexW1993427030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.