Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25939614›Full record

SynthesisThe international journal of neuropsychopharmacology2015

Antipsychotic Augmentation of Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Treatment-Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: An Update Meta-Analysis of Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials.

Markus Dold, Martin Aigner, Rupert Lanzenberger, Siegfried Kasper

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Markus DoldDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (Drs Dold, Lanzenberger, and Kasper); Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tulln, Karl Landsteiner University, Tulln, Austria (Dr Aigner).
Martin AignerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (Drs Dold, Lanzenberger, and Kasper); Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tulln, Karl Landsteiner University, Tulln, Austria (Dr Aigner).
Rupert LanzenbergerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (Drs Dold, Lanzenberger, and Kasper); Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tulln, Karl Landsteiner University, Tulln, Austria (Dr Aigner).
Siegfried KasperDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (Drs Dold, Lanzenberger, and Kasper); Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tulln, Karl Landsteiner University, Tulln, Austria (Dr Aigner). sci-biolpsy@meduniwien.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder do not respond adequately to serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Augmentation with antipsychotic drugs can be beneficial in this regard. However, since new relevant randomized controlled trials evaluating new antipsychotics were conducted, a recalculation of the effect sizes appears necessary.

methodsWe meta-analyzed all double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials comparing augmentation of serotonin reuptake inhibitors with antipsychotics to placebo supplementation in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder. The primary outcome was mean change in the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale total score. Secondary outcomes were obsessions, compulsions, response rates, and attrition rates. The data collection process was conducted independently by 2 authors. Hedges's g and risks ratios were calculated as effect sizes. In preplanned meta-regressions, subgroup analyses, and sensitivity analyses, we examined the robustness of the results and explored reasons for potential heterogeneity.

resultsAltogether, 14 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (n=491) investigating quetiapine (N=4, n=142), risperidone (N=4, n=132), aripiprazole (N=2, n=79), olanzapine (N=2, n=70), paliperidone (N=1, n=34), and haloperidol (N=1, n=34) were incorporated. Augmentation with antipsychotics was significantly more efficacious than placebo in Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale total reduction (N=14, n=478; Hedges's g=-0.64, 95% CI: -0.87 to -0.41; P=<.01). Aripiprazole (Hedges's g=-1.35), haloperidol (Hedges's g=-0.82), and risperidone (Hedges's g=-0.59) significantly outperformed placebo. Antipsychotics were superior to placebo in treating obsessions, compulsions, and achieving response. There was no between-group difference concerning all-cause discontinuation. The nonsignificant meta-regressions suggest no influence of the antipsychotic dose or baseline symptom severity on the meta-analytic results.

conclusionsAccording to our findings, antipsychotic augmentation of serotonin reuptake inhibitors can be regarded as an evidence-based measure in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Indexed as

Drug SynergismOutcome Assessment, Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdultAntipsychotic AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObsessive-Compulsive DisorderSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAntipsychotic AgentsSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitorsantipsychoticsmeta-analysisObsessive-compulsive disorderserotonin reuptake inhibitorstreatment resistance

Identifiers

PMID25939614
PMCPMC4576518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.