Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25939584›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

Evaluating an extended rehabilitation service for stroke patients (EXTRAS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Helen Rodgers, Lisa Shaw, Robin Cant, Avril Drummond, Gary A Ford, Anne Forster, Katie Hills, Denise Howel, Anne-Marie Laverty, Christopher McKevitt and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Telerehabilitation services for stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Early supported discharge services for people with acute stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Helen RodgersInstitute of Neuroscience (Stroke Research Group), Newcastle University, 3-4 Claremont Terrace, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AE, England, UK. Helen.Rodgers@newcastle.ac.uk.
Lisa ShawInstitute of Neuroscience (Stroke Research Group), Newcastle University, 3-4 Claremont Terrace, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AE, England, UK. Lisa.Shaw@newcastle.ac.uk.
Robin CantLay investigator. Contact via: Institute of Neuroscience (Stroke Research Group), Newcastle University, 3-4 Claremont Terrace, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AE, England, UK. Helen.Rodgers@newcastle.ac.uk.
Avril DrummondDivision of Rehabilitation and Ageing, University of Nottingham, B Floor, Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, England, UK. Avril.Drummond@nottingham.ac.uk.
Gary A FordOxford Academic Health Science Network, John Eccles House, Robert Robinson Avenue, Oxford Science Business Park, Oxford, OX4 4GP, England, UK. Gary.Ford@ouh.nhs.uk.
Anne ForsterAcademic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Bradford Institute for Health, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, England, UK. A.Forster@leeds.ac.uk.
Katie HillsInstitute of Neuroscience (Stroke Research Group), Newcastle University, 3-4 Claremont Terrace, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AE, England, UK. Katie_Barrick@hotmail.co.uk.
Denise HowelInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, England, UK. Denise.Howel@newcastle.ac.uk.
Anne-Marie LavertyStroke Northumbria, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Wansbeck General Hospital, Woodhorn Lane, Ashington, Northumberland, NE63 9JJ, England, UK. Anne-Marie.Laverty@northumbria-healthcare.nhs.uk.
Christopher McKevittDepartment of Public Health Sciences, King's College London, Capital House, 7th Floor, 41 Western Street, London, SE1 3QD, England, UK. Christopher.Mckevitt@kcl.ac.uk.
Peter McMeekinFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coach Lane Campus, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7XA, England, UK. Peter.McMeekin@northumbria.ac.uk.
Christopher PriceInstitute of Neuroscience (Stroke Research Group), Newcastle University, 3-4 Claremont Terrace, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AE, England, UK. C.I.M.Price@newcastle.ac.uk.

Funding

Department of Health 10/37/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDevelopment of longer term stroke rehabilitation services is limited by lack of evidence of effectiveness for specific interventions and service models. We describe the protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial which is evaluating an extended stroke rehabilitation service. The extended service commences when routine 'organised stroke care' (stroke unit and early supported discharge (ESD)) ends. METHODS/

designThis study is a multicentre randomised controlled trial with health economic and process evaluations. It is set within NHS stroke services which provide ESD. Participants are adults who have experienced a new stroke (and carer if appropriate), discharged from hospital under the care of an ESD team. The intervention group receives an extended stroke rehabilitation service provided for 18 months following completion of ESD. The extended rehabilitation service involves regular contact with a senior ESD team member who leads and coordinates further rehabilitation. Contact is usually by telephone. The control group receives usual stroke care post-ESD. Usual care may involve referral of patients to a range of rehabilitation services upon completion of ESD in accordance with local clinical practice. Randomisation is via a central independent web-based service. The primary outcome is extended activities of daily living (Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale) at 24 months post-randomisation. Secondary outcomes (at 12 and 24 months post-randomisation) are health status, quality of life, mood and experience of services for patients, and quality of life, experience of services and carer stress for carers. Resource use and adverse events are also collected. Outcomes are undertaken by a blinded assessor. Implementation and delivery of the extended stroke rehabilitation service will also be described. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with a subsample of participants and staff to gain insight into perceptions and experiences of rehabilitation services delivered or received. Allowing for 25% attrition, 510 participants are needed to provide 90% power to detect a difference in mean Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale score of 6 with a 5% significance level. DISCUSSION: The provision of longer term support for stroke survivors is currently limited. The results from this trial will inform future stroke service planning and configuration.

trial registrationThis trial was registered with ISRCTN (identifier: ISRCTN45203373 ) on 9 August 2012.

Indexed as

Stroke RehabilitationActivities of Daily LivingCaregiversClinical ProtocolsCommunity Health ServicesContinuity of Patient CareHealth StatusHumansInterviews as TopicPatient Care TeamPatient DischargeProgram EvaluationQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionResearch DesignSample Size

Identifiers

PMID25939584
PMCPMC4445280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.