Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25939456›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2015

Multitasking: Effects of processing multiple auditory feature patterns.

Tova Miller, Sufen Chen, Wei Wei Lee, Elyse S Sussman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Model for Statistical Regularity Extraction from Dynamic Sounds.Acta acustica united with acustica : the journal of the European Acoustics Association (EEIG)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tova MillerDepartment of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Sufen ChenDepartment of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Wei Wei LeeDepartment of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Elyse S SussmanDepartment of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.

Funding

Neurophysiological Correlates of Information ProcessingR01DC004263 · NIDCD · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI SUSSMAN, ELYSE S · 2001 to 2016
$4.9M
NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL CORRELATES OF INFORMATION PROCESSINGR55DC004263 · NIDCD · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI SUSSMAN, ELYSE S · 2000 to 2000
$100k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC004263NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004263NIDCD NIH HHS R55 DC004263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ERPs and behavioral responses were measured to assess how task-irrelevant sounds interact with task processing demands and affect the ability to monitor and track multiple sound events. Participants listened to four-tone sequential frequency patterns, and responded to frequency pattern deviants (reversals of the pattern). Irrelevant tone feature patterns (duration and intensity) and respective pattern deviants were presented together with frequency patterns and frequency pattern deviants in separate conditions. Responses to task-relevant and task-irrelevant feature pattern deviants were used to test processing demands for irrelevant sound input. Behavioral performance was significantly better when there were no distracting feature patterns. Errors primarily occurred in response to the to-be-ignored feature pattern deviants. Task-irrelevant elicitation of ERP components was consistent with the error analysis, indicating a level of processing for the irrelevant features. Task-relevant elicitation of ERP components was consistent with behavioral performance, demonstrating a "cost" of performance when there were two feature patterns presented simultaneously. These results provide evidence that the brain tracked the irrelevant duration and intensity feature patterns, affecting behavioral performance. Overall, our results demonstrate that irrelevant informational streams are processed at a cost, which may be considered a type of multitasking that is an ongoing, automatic processing of task-irrelevant sensory events.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultAttentionAuditory PerceptionBrainBrain MappingElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeSoundYoung AdultAttentionAuditory processesCognitionEEGNormal volunteers

Identifiers

PMID25939456
PMCPMC4946337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.