Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25939393›Full record

ArticleThe Prostate2015

A multicenter study shows PTEN deletion is strongly associated with seminal vesicle involvement and extracapsular extension in localized prostate cancer.

Dean A Troyer, Tamara Jamaspishvili, Wei Wei, Ziding Feng, Jennifer Good, Sarah Hawley, Ladan Fazli, Jesse K McKenney, Jeff Simko, Antonio Hurtado-Coll and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Prostate, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The impact of PTEN deletion and ERG rearrangement on recurrence after treatment for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Artificial intelligence in prostate cancer.Chinese medical journal · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Exploring therapeutic applications ofFrontiers in oncology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Artificial Intelligence-Based PTEN Loss Assessment as an Early Predictor of Prostate Cancer Metastasis After Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The combination of PTEN deletion and 16p13.3 gain in prostate cancer provides additional prognostic information in patients treated with radical prostatectomy.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 14 institutions in 3 countries.

Dean A TroyerEastern Virginia Medical School, Pathology and Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Norfolk, Virginia.
Tamara JamaspishviliDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Wei WeiDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Ziding FengDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jennifer GoodDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah HawleyCanary Foundation, Canary Center at Stanford, 3155 Porter Drive, Palo Alto.
Ladan FazliThe Prostate Center at Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jesse K McKenneyDepartment of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Jeff SimkoDepartment of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Antonio Hurtado-CollThe Prostate Center at Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Peter R CarrollDepartment of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Martin GleaveThe Prostate Center at Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Raymond LanceDepartment of Urology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.
Daniel W LinDepartment of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Peter S NelsonDivision of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Ian M ThompsonDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Lawrence D TrueDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
James D BrooksDepartment of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Jeremy A SquireDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Queen's University · CAThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USVancouver General Hospital · CACanary Foundation · USCleveland Clinic · USEastern Virginia Medical School · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USStanford University · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Washington · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
TRANSCRIPTOME AND PROTEOME STRATIFICATION OF PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA PHENOTYPESP50CA097186 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI PETER S NELSON · 2002 to 2026
$58.1M
New Tools for Prostate Cancer Detection and PrognosticationU01CA152737 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BROOKS, JAMES D., GAMBHIR, SANJIV S · 2010 to 2015
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA08636815NCI NIH HHS CA097186NCI NIH HHS CA152737-01NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097186NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLoss of the phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) tumor suppressor gene is a promising marker of aggressive prostate cancer. Active surveillance and watchful waiting are increasingly recommended to patients with small tumors felt to be low risk, highlighting the difficulties of Gleason scoring in this setting. There is an urgent need for predictive biomarkers that can be rapidly deployed to aid in clinical decision-making. Our objectives were to assess the incidence and ability of PTEN alterations to predict aggressive disease in a multicenter study.

methodsWe used recently developed probes optimized for sensitivity and specificity in a four-color FISH deletion assay to study the Canary Retrospective multicenter Prostate Cancer Tissue Microarray (TMA). This TMA was constructed specifically for biomarker validation from radical prostatectomy specimens, and is accompanied by detailed clinical information with long-term follow-up.

resultsIn 612 prostate cancers, the overall rate of PTEN deletion was 112 (18.3%). Hemizygous PTEN losses were present in 55/612 (9.0%) of cancers, whereas homozygous PTEN deletion was observed in 57/612 (9.3%) of tumors. Significant associations were found between PTEN status and pathologic stage (P < 0.0001), seminal vesicle invasion (P = 0.0008), extracapsular extension (P < 0.0001), and Gleason score (P = 0.0002). In logistic regression analysis of clinical and pathological variables, PTEN deletion was significantly associated with extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle involvement, and higher Gleason score. In the 406 patients in which clinical information was available, PTEN homozygous (P = 0.009) deletion was associated with worse post-operative recurrence-free survival (number of events = 189), pre-operative prostate specific antigen (PSA) (P < 0.001), and pathologic stage (P = 0.03).

conclusionPTEN status assessed by FISH is an independent predictor for recurrence-free survival in multivariate models, as were seminal vesicle invasion, extracapsular extension, and Gleason score, and preoperative PSA. Furthermore, these data demonstrate that the assay can be readily introduced at first diagnosis in a cost effective manner analogous to the use of FISH for analysis of HER2/neu status in breast cancer. Combined with published research beginning 17 years ago, both the data and tools now exist to implement a PTEN assay in the clinic.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaProstatic NeoplasmsAgedBiomarkers, TumorDisease-Free SurvivalHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm InvasivenessPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProstateProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenPTEN PhosphohydrolaseBiomarkers, TumorProstate-Specific AntigenPTEN PhosphohydrolasePTEN protein, humanactive surveillancebiomarkerfluorescence in situ hybridizationGleason scorePI3K/PTEN/Akt pathwaytissue array analysis

Identifiers

PMID25939393
PMCPMC4475421
OpenAlexW2155672452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.