Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25938768›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Vitamin D intake, month the mammogram was taken and mammographic density in Norwegian women aged 50-69.

Merete Ellingjord-Dale, Isabel dos-Santos-Silva, Tom Grotmol, Amrit Kaur Sakhi, Solveig Hofvind, Samera Qureshi, Marianne Skov Markussen, Elisabeth Couto, Linda Vos, Giske Ursin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Vitamin D and Mammographic Findings.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Merete Ellingjord-DaleUniversity of OsloOslo, Norway.
Isabel dos-Santos-SilvaDepartment of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Tom GrotmolCancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Amrit Kaur SakhiNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Solveig HofvindCancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Samera QureshiNorwegian Centre for Minority Health Research, Oslo, Norway.
Marianne Skov MarkussenUniversity of OsloOslo, Norway.
Elisabeth CoutoNorwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Health Economic and Drug Unit, Oslo, Norway.
Linda VosCancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Giske UrsinUniversity of OsloOslo, Norway; Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States of America.
Cancer Registry of Norway · NOUniversity of Oslo · NOLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten · NONorwegian Institute of Public Health · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of vitamin D in breast cancer etiology is unclear. There is some, but inconsistent, evidence that vitamin D is associated with both breast cancer risk and mammographic density (MD). We evaluated the associations of MD with month the mammogram was taken, and with vitamin D intake, in a population of women from Norway--a country with limited sunlight exposure for a large part of the year.

methods3114 women aged 50-69, who participated in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) in 2004 or 2006/07, completed risk factor and food frequency (FFQ) questionnaires. Dietary and total (dietary plus supplements) vitamin D, calcium and energy intakes were estimated by the FFQ. Month when the mammogram was taken was recorded on the mammogram. Percent MD was assessed using a computer assisted method (Madena, University of Southern California) after digitization of the films. Linear regression models were used to investigate percent MD associations with month the mammogram was taken, and vitamin D and calcium intakes, adjusting for age, body mass index (BMI), study year, estrogen and progestin therapy (EPT), education, parity, calcium intakes and energy intakes.

resultsThere was no statistical significant association between the month the mammogram was taken and percent MD. Overall, there was no association between percent MD and quartiles of total or dietary vitamin D intakes, or of calcium intake. However, analysis restricted to women aged <55 years revealed a suggestive inverse association between total vitamin D intake and percent MD (p for trend = 0.03).

conclusionOverall, we found no strong evidence that month the mammogram was taken was associated with percent MD. We found no inverse association between vitamin D intake and percent MD overall, but observed a suggestive inverse association between dietary vitamin D and MD for women less than 55 years old.

Indexed as

MammographySeasonsAgedBreast DensityBreast NeoplasmsCalcium, DietaryFemaleGeographyHumansMammary Glands, HumanMiddle AgedNorwayRisk FactorsVitamin D25-hydroxyvitamin DCalcium, DietaryVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID25938768
PMCPMC4418832
OpenAlexW2171378319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.