Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25938729›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of neuroscience2015

Chemosensory receptor specificity and regulation.

Ryan P Dalton, Stavros Lomvardas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neurophysiological Responses to Inhalation ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Transcriptional priming and chromatin regulation during stochastic cell fate specification.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Perspectives on defining cell types in the brain.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2019
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan P DaltonDepartment of Anatomy.
Stavros Lomvardas
Columbia University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

The Unfolded Protein Response as an Organizer of Chemosensory ResponseR01DC014144 · NIDCD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LOMVARDAS, STAVROS · 2014 to 2018
$2.1M
Controlling epigenetic states and nuclear architecture in the brainR01DA036894 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BARNEA, GILAD, LOMVARDAS, STAVROS · 2013 to 2017
$1.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036894NIDA NIH HHS R01DA036894NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014144NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC014144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The senses provide a means by which data on the physical and chemical properties of the environment may be collected and meaningfully interpreted. Sensation begins at the periphery, where a multitude of different sensory cell types are activated by environmental stimuli as different as photons and odorant molecules. Stimulus sensitivity is due to expression of different cell surface sensory receptors, and therefore the receptive field of each sense is defined by the aggregate of expressed receptors in each sensory tissue. Here, we review current understanding on patterns of expression and modes of regulation of sensory receptors.

Indexed as

AnimalsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, OdorantSensory Receptor CellsTaste Receptors, Type 2Vomeronasal OrganReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, Odoranttaste receptors, type 1Taste Receptors, Type 2feedbackgene regulationolfactionstochasticitytaste

Identifiers

PMID25938729
PMCPMC4882759
OpenAlexW2156054659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.