Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25938683›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2015

A serum vitamin D level <25nmol/l pose high tuberculosis risk: a meta-analysis.

Junli Zeng, Guannan Wu, Wen Yang, Xiaoling Gu, Wenjun Liang, Yanwen Yao, Yong Song

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Peptide-Based Strategies AgainstPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Case-control study of vitamin D status and adult multidrug-resistant pulmonary TB.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Junli ZengDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Southern Medical University (Guangzhou), Nanjing, China 210002.
Guannan WuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China 210002.
Wen YangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China 210002.
Xiaoling GuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China 210002.
Wenjun LiangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China 210002.
Yanwen YaoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China 210002.
Yong SongDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Southern Medical University (Guangzhou), Nanjing, China 210002; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China 210002.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow serum Vitamin D is considered to be associated with tuberculosis while the "dangerous" level was not clear. The aim of this study was to identify the association between tuberculosis and serum Vitamin D levels via synthesis of available evidence.

methodsA search of EMBASE, Medline, ISI Web of knowledge, and Pubmed was conducted. The number of subjects of tuberculosis and no-tuberculosis groups in four Vitamin D range. Meta-analyses were performed and presented by odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsA total of 15 studies involving 1440 cases and 2558 controls were included. A significantly increased risk of tuberculosis was found in two ranges: ≤ 12.5 nmol/L: pooled OR = 4.556, 95% CI = 2.200-9.435; 13-25 nmol/L: pooled OR = 3.797, 95% CI = 1.935-7.405. No statistically significant risk of tuberculosis was found in the range of 26-50 nmol/L (pooled OR = 1.561, 95% CI =0.997-2.442). In range 51-75 nmol/L, no positive association was found (pooled OR =1.160, 95% CI = 0.708-1.900).

conclusionsThis study found that a serum Vitamin D level ≤ 25 nmol/L was significantly associated with an increased risk of tuberculosis while the range of 51-75 nmol/L was not. The range 26-50nmol/L posed potential high tuberculosis risk. Future large-scale, well-designed studies are needed to verify these results.

Indexed as

RiskCase-Control StudiesHumansOdds RatioTuberculosisVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID25938683
PMCPMC4418705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.