Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25938669›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Using community-based participatory research principles to develop more understandable recruitment and informed consent documents in genomic research.

Harlyn G Skinner, Larissa Calancie, Maihan B Vu, Beverly Garcia, Molly DeMarco, Cam Patterson, Alice Ammerman, Jonathan C Schisler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Co-creation and engagement in a DNA integrity cohort study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Harlyn G SkinnerDepartment of Nutrition, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Larissa CalancieDepartment of Nutrition, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Maihan B VuCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Beverly GarciaCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Molly DeMarcoCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Cam PattersonPresbyterian Hospital/Weill-Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Alice AmmermanDepartment of Nutrition, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America; Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jonathan C SchislerMcAllister Heart Institute, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America; Department of Pharmacology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USCornell University · US

Funding

REDUCING DISPARITIES IN HYPERTENSION WITH A PRACTICE-BASED ENHANCED CARE PROGRAMP50HL105184 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI AMMERMAN, ALICE S · 2010 to 2014
$10.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS 1P50HL105184-01NHLBI NIH HHS P50 HL105184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeart Healthy Lenoir is a transdisciplinary project aimed at creating long-term, sustainable approaches to reduce cardiovascular disease risk disparities in Lenoir County, North Carolina using a design spanning genomic analysis and clinical intervention. We hypothesized that residents of Lenoir County would be unfamiliar and mistrustful of genomic research, and therefore reluctant to participate; additionally, these feelings would be higher in African-Americans. METHODOLOGY: To test our hypothesis, we conducted qualitative research using community-based participatory research principles to ensure our genomic research strategies addressed the needs, priorities, and concerns of the community. African-American (n = 19) and White (n = 16) adults in Lenoir County participated in four focus groups exploring perceptions about genomics and cardiovascular disease. Demographic surveys were administered and a semi-structured interview guide was used to facilitate discussions. The discussions were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed in ATLAS.ti. RESULTS AND SIGNIFICANCE: From our analysis, key themes emerged: transparent communication, privacy, participation incentives and barriers, knowledge, and the impact of knowing. African-Americans were more concerned about privacy and community impact compared to Whites, however, African-Americans were still eager to participate in our genomic research project. The results from our formative study were used to improve the informed consent and recruitment processes by: 1) reducing misconceptions of genomic studies; and 2) helping to foster participant understanding and trust with the researchers. Our study demonstrates how community-based participatory research principles can be used to gain deeper insight into the community and increase participation in genomic research studies. Due in part to these efforts 80.3% of eligible African-American participants and 86.9% of eligible White participants enrolled in the Heart Healthy Lenoir Genomics study making our overall enrollment 57.8% African-American. Future research will investigate return of genomic results in the Lenoir community.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchConsent FormsGenomicsInformed ConsentPersonnel SelectionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCommunicationDemographyFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID25938669
PMCPMC4418607
OpenAlexW248439213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.