ArticlePloS one2015
Using community-based participatory research principles to develop more understandable recruitment and informed consent documents in genomic research.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on privacy and genetic information in the United States.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- "There's no representation": a qualitative study of attitudes and motivations towards genomic research participation among Australian South Asians.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Bridging global diversity gaps in Parkinson disease research.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Engaging migrants and immigrants in genetics research.Nature genetics · 2025Review
- Article
- Respectful closure of a CEnR DNA integrity study: A bridge to sustained interactions with research participants.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Community Collaboration in Public Health Genetic Literacy: Methods for Co-Designing Educational Resources for Equitable Genomics Research and Practice.Public health genomics · 2025Article
- "I just don't know enough": Australian perspectives on community involvement in health and medical research.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Community-Engaged Recommendations for Empowering People Living With Dementia to be Research Collaborators.The Gerontologist · 2024Article
- Diversity, equity, inclusion, and access are necessary for clinical trial site readiness.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Disseminating for impact: creating curriculum activities for translational dissemination for the clinical and translational research workforce.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Understanding men's beliefs and concerns about linking health data in the context of precision medicine.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Co-creation and engagement in a DNA integrity cohort study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Engaging Patient Advisory Committees to Inform a Genomic Cancer Risk Study: Lessons for Future Efforts.The Permanente journal · 2022Article
- Learning from Black/African American Participants: Applying the Integrated Behavioral Model to Assess Recruitment Strategies for a Glaucoma Genetic Study.Health communication · 2022Article
- Community-Based Participatory Research to Improve Cardiovascular Health Among US Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups.Current epidemiology reports · 2022Review
- Addressing diversity and inclusion challenges in global neuro-psychiatric and behavioral genomics research.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- "Data is the new oil": citizen science and informed consent in an era of researchers handling of an economically valuable resource.Life sciences, society and policy · 2021Article
- Engagement and return of results preferences among a primarily African American genomic sequencing research cohort.American journal of human genetics · 2021Article
- A scoping review of social and behavioral science research to translate genomic discoveries into population health impact.Translational behavioral medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHeart Healthy Lenoir is a transdisciplinary project aimed at creating long-term, sustainable approaches to reduce cardiovascular disease risk disparities in Lenoir County, North Carolina using a design spanning genomic analysis and clinical intervention. We hypothesized that residents of Lenoir County would be unfamiliar and mistrustful of genomic research, and therefore reluctant to participate; additionally, these feelings would be higher in African-Americans. METHODOLOGY: To test our hypothesis, we conducted qualitative research using community-based participatory research principles to ensure our genomic research strategies addressed the needs, priorities, and concerns of the community. African-American (n = 19) and White (n = 16) adults in Lenoir County participated in four focus groups exploring perceptions about genomics and cardiovascular disease. Demographic surveys were administered and a semi-structured interview guide was used to facilitate discussions. The discussions were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed in ATLAS.ti. RESULTS AND SIGNIFICANCE: From our analysis, key themes emerged: transparent communication, privacy, participation incentives and barriers, knowledge, and the impact of knowing. African-Americans were more concerned about privacy and community impact compared to Whites, however, African-Americans were still eager to participate in our genomic research project. The results from our formative study were used to improve the informed consent and recruitment processes by: 1) reducing misconceptions of genomic studies; and 2) helping to foster participant understanding and trust with the researchers. Our study demonstrates how community-based participatory research principles can be used to gain deeper insight into the community and increase participation in genomic research studies. Due in part to these efforts 80.3% of eligible African-American participants and 86.9% of eligible White participants enrolled in the Heart Healthy Lenoir Genomics study making our overall enrollment 57.8% African-American. Future research will investigate return of genomic results in the Lenoir community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.