Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25938664›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Postnatal persistent infection with classical Swine Fever virus and its immunological implications.

Sara Muñoz-González, Nicolas Ruggli, Rosa Rosell, Lester Josué Pérez, Maria Teresa Frías-Leuporeau, Lorenzo Fraile, Maria Montoya, Lorena Cordoba, Mariano Domingo, Felix Ehrensperger and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Removal of the EJournal of virology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Sara Muñoz-GonzálezCentre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), IRTA-Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Campus de la UAB, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Nicolas RuggliInstitute of Virology and immunology (IVI), Mittelhäusern, Switzerland.
Rosa RosellCentre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), IRTA-Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Campus de la UAB, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain; Departament d'Agricultura, Ramaderia, Pesca, Alimentació i Medi Natural, (DAAM), Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain.
Lester Josué PérezCentro Nacional de Sanidad Agropecuaria (CENSA), La Habana, Cuba.
Maria Teresa Frías-LeuporeauCentro Nacional de Sanidad Agropecuaria (CENSA), La Habana, Cuba.
Lorenzo FraileDepartament de Producció Animal, ETSEA, Universidad de Lleida, Lleida, Spain.
Maria MontoyaCentre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), IRTA-Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Campus de la UAB, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain; Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentaria (IRTA), Barcelona, Spain.
Lorena CordobaCentre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), IRTA-Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Campus de la UAB, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Mariano DomingoCentre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), IRTA-Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Campus de la UAB, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain; Departamento de Sanitat i d'Anatomia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, UAB, Bellaterra-Barcelona, Spain.
Felix EhrenspergerInstitute of Veterinary Pathology, Division of Immunopathology, University Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Artur SummerfieldInstitute of Virology and immunology (IVI), Mittelhäusern, Switzerland.
Llilianne GangesCentre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), IRTA-Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Campus de la UAB, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESCentre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal · ESCentro Nacional de Sanidad Agropecuaria · CUGovernment of Catalonia · ESUniversitat de Lleida · ESUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well established that trans-placental transmission of classical swine fever virus (CSFV) during mid-gestation can lead to persistently infected offspring. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the ability of CSFV to induce viral persistence upon early postnatal infection. Two litters of 10 piglets each were infected intranasally on the day of birth with low and moderate virulence CSFV isolates, respectively. During six weeks after postnatal infection, most of the piglets remained clinically healthy, despite persistent high virus titres in the serum. Importantly, these animals were unable to mount any detectable humoral and cellular immune response. At necropsy, the most prominent gross pathological lesion was a severe thymus atrophy. Four weeks after infection, PBMCs from the persistently infected seronegative piglets were unresponsive to both, specific CSFV and non-specific PHA stimulation in terms of IFN-γ-producing cells. These results suggested the development of a state of immunosuppression in these postnatally persistently infected pigs. However, IL-10 was undetectable in the sera of the persistently infected animals. Interestingly, CSFV-stimulated PBMCs from the persistently infected piglets produced IL-10. Nevertheless, despite the addition of the anti-IL-10 antibody in the PBMC culture from persistently infected piglets, the response of the IFN-γ producing cells was not restored. Therefore, other factors than IL-10 may be involved in the general suppression of the T-cell responses upon CSFV and mitogen activation. Interestingly, bone marrow immature granulocytes were increased and targeted by the virus in persistently infected piglets. Taken together, we provided the first data demonstrating the feasibility of CSFV in generating a postnatal persistent disease, which has not been shown for other members of the Pestivirus genus yet. Since serological methods are routinely used in CSFV surveillance, persistently infected pigs might go unnoticed. In addition to the epidemiological and economic significance of persistent CSFV infection, this model could be useful for understanding the mechanisms of viral persistence.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBone Marrow CellsCell LineClassical Swine FeverClassical Swine Fever VirusFemaleGranulocytesHost-Pathogen InteractionsImmunity, CellularImmunity, HumoralInterferon-gammaInterleukin-10Leukocytes, MononuclearAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralInterferon-gammaInterleukin-10

Identifiers

PMID25938664
PMCPMC4418595
OpenAlexW2103048257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.