ArticlePloS one2015
Predicting stroop effect from spontaneous neuronal activity: a study of regional homogeneity.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The local properties of bold signal fluctuations at rest monitor inhibitory control training in adolescents.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2019Trial
- Isolating perceptual conflict: a theoretical and methodological analysis of the Task-Irrelevant Paradigm.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Association of magnetic resonance imaging glymphatic function with gray matter volume loss and cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease: a diffusion tensor image analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Unveiling Cognitive Interference: fNIRS Insights Into Poststroke Aphasia During Stroop Tasks.Neural plasticity · 2025Article
- Executive functioning moderates the decline of retrieval fluency in time.Psychological research · 2023Article
- Training-Specific Changes in Regional Spontaneous Neural Activity Among Professional Chinese Chess Players.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- The Role in Road Traffic Accident and Anxiety as Moderators Attention Biases in Modified Emotional Stroop Test.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Functional cerebral asymmetry analyses reveal how the control system implements its flexibility.Human brain mapping · 2018Article
- Altered intrinsic brain activity after chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer: A preliminary study.European radiology · 2017Article
- The Impact of Aromatherapy Gelatin Cold Compresses on the Concentration Level of Students in the Covid-19 Pandemic Online Class.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Stroop effect is one of the most robust and well-studied phenomena in cognitive psychology and cognitive neuroscience. However, little is known about the relationship between intrinsic brain activity and the individual differences of this effect. In the present study, we explored this issue by examining whether resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) signals could predict individual differences in the Stroop effect of healthy individuals. A partial correlation analysis was calculated to examine the relationship between regional homogeneity (ReHo) and Stroop effect size, while controlling for age, sex, and framewise displacement (FD). The results showed positive correlations in the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG), the left insula, the ventral anterior cingulate cortex (vACC), and the medial frontal gyrus (MFG), and negative correlation in the left precentral gyrus (LPG). These results indicate the possible influences of the LIFG, the left insula, and the LPG on the efficiency of cognitive control, and demonstrate that the key nodes of default mode network (DMN) may be important in goal-directed behavior and/or mental effort during cognitive control tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.