Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25938414›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2015

Development of a comprehensive hospital-based elder abuse intervention: an initial systematic scoping review.

Janice Du Mont, Sheila Macdonald, Daisy Kosa, Shannon Elliot, Charmaine Spencer, Mark Yaffe

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisScoping Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Context of Elder Maltreatment: an Opportunity for Prevention Science.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Systematic Scoping Review of Ethical Issues in Mentoring in Surgery.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Janice Du MontWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sheila MacdonaldOntario Network of Sexual Assault/Domestic Violence Treatments Centres, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Daisy KosaWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Ontario Network of Sexual Assault/Domestic Violence Treatments Centres, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shannon ElliotWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Ontario Network of Sexual Assault/Domestic Violence Treatments Centres, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Charmaine SpencerGerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Mark YaffeDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Department of Family Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research SCI-131864
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElder abuse, a universal human rights problem, is associated with many negative consequences. In most jurisdictions, however, there are no comprehensive hospital-based interventions for elder abuse that address the totality of needs of abused older adults: psychological, physical, legal, and social. As the first step towards the development of such an intervention, we undertook a systematic scoping review.

objectivesOur primary objective was to systematically extract and synthesize actionable and applicable recommendations for components of a multidisciplinary intersectoral hospital-based elder abuse intervention. A secondary objective was to summarize the characteristics of the responses reviewed, including methods of development and validation.

methodsThe grey and scholarly literatures were systematically searched, with two independent reviewers conducting the title, abstract and full text screening. Documents were considered eligible for inclusion if they: 1) addressed a response (e.g., an intervention) to elder abuse, 2) contained recommendations for responding to abused older adults with potential relevance to a multidisciplinary and intersectoral hospital-based elder abuse intervention; and 3) were available in English. ANALYSIS: The extracted recommendations for care were collated, coded, categorized into themes, and further reviewed for relevancy to a comprehensive hospital-based response. Characteristics of the responses were summarized using descriptive statistics.

results649 recommendations were extracted from 68 distinct elder abuse responses, 149 of which were deemed relevant and were categorized into 5 themes: Initial contact; Capacity and consent; Interview with older adult, caregiver, collateral contacts, and/or suspected abuser; ASSESSMENT: physical/forensic, mental, psychosocial, and environmental/functional; and care plan. Only 6 responses had been evaluated, suggesting a significant gap between development and implementation of recommendations. DISCUSSION: To address the lack of evidence to support the recommendations extracted in this review, in a future study, a group of experts will formally evaluate each recommendation for its inclusion in a comprehensive hospital-based response.

Indexed as

Early Medical InterventionElder AbuseHospitalizationAgedFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID25938414
PMCPMC4418829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.