Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25938272›Full record

ReviewToxins2015

Do the A subunits contribute to the differences in the toxicity of Shiga toxin 1 and Shiga toxin 2?

Debaleena Basu, Nilgun E Tumer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Modeling Shiga toxin-induced human renal-specific microvascular injury.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2024
    Article
  6. The diverse landscape of AB5-type toxins.Engineering microbiology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. EnterohemorrhagicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genomic Epidemiology of Shiga Toxin-ProducingAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Debaleena BasuDepartment of Plant Biology and Pathology, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8520, USA. debabasu@rutgers.edu.
Nilgun E TumerDepartment of Plant Biology and Pathology, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8520, USA. tumer@aesop.rutgers.edu.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

What makes ricin ToxicR01AI072425 · NIAID · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI TUMER, NILGUN E · 2007 to 2021
$5.8M
Role of the ribosomal stalk in the activity of Shiga toxinsR21AI092011 · NIAID · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI TUMER, NILGUN E · 2012 to 2013
$419k
NIAID NIH HHS AI072425NIAID NIH HHS AI092011NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI072425NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI092011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli O157:H7 (STEC) is one of the leading causes of food-poisoning around the world. Some STEC strains produce Shiga toxin 1 (Stx1) and/or Shiga toxin 2 (Stx2) or variants of either toxin, which are critical for the development of hemorrhagic colitis (HC) or hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). Currently, there are no therapeutic treatments for HC or HUS. E. coli O157:H7 strains carrying Stx2 are more virulent and are more frequently associated with HUS, which is the most common cause of renal failure in children in the US. The basis for the increased potency of Stx2 is not fully understood. Shiga toxins belong to the AB5 family of protein toxins with an A subunit, which depurinates a universally conserved adenine residue in the α-sarcin/ricin loop (SRL) of the 28S rRNA and five copies of the B subunit responsible for binding to cellular receptors. Recent studies showed differences in the structure, receptor binding, dependence on ribosomal proteins and pathogenicity of Stx1 and Stx2 and supported a role for the B subunit in differential toxicity. However, the current data do not rule out a potential role for the A1 subunits in the differential toxicity of Stx1 and Stx2. This review highlights the recent progress in understanding the differences in the A1 subunits of Stx1 and Stx2 and their role in defining toxicity.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansProtein ConformationProtein SubunitsRibosomesShiga Toxin 1Shiga Toxin 2Protein SubunitsShiga Toxin 1Shiga Toxin 2

Identifiers

PMID25938272
PMCPMC4448158
OpenAlexW2072877561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.