ReviewISRN bioinformatics2014
Hierarchical ensemble methods for protein function prediction.
Review in ISRN bioinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting enzyme-compound associations for enzyme-catalysed reactions.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- Using interpretable boosting algorithms for modeling environmental and agricultural data.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A Network-Based Approach for Improving Annotation of Transcription Factor Functions and Binding Sites inGenes · 2023Article
- Gene function finding through cross-organism ensemble learning.BioData mining · 2021Article
- A Literature Review of Gene Function Prediction by Modeling Gene Ontology.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
- Article
- Prediction of Human Phenotype Ontology terms by means of hierarchical ensemble methods.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Predicting protein function and other biomedical characteristics with heterogeneous ensembles.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2016Article
- Predicting protein function via downward random walks on a gene ontology.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Predicting protein functions using incomplete hierarchical labels.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Integrating multiple networks for protein function prediction.BMC systems biology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein function prediction is a complex multiclass multilabel classification problem, characterized by multiple issues such as the incompleteness of the available annotations, the integration of multiple sources of high dimensional biomolecular data, the unbalance of several functional classes, and the difficulty of univocally determining negative examples. Moreover, the hierarchical relationships between functional classes that characterize both the Gene Ontology and FunCat taxonomies motivate the development of hierarchy-aware prediction methods that showed significantly better performances than hierarchical-unaware "flat" prediction methods. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of hierarchical methods for protein function prediction based on ensembles of learning machines. According to this general approach, a separate learning machine is trained to learn a specific functional term and then the resulting predictions are assembled in a "consensus" ensemble decision, taking into account the hierarchical relationships between classes. The main hierarchical ensemble methods proposed in the literature are discussed in the context of existing computational methods for protein function prediction, highlighting their characteristics, advantages, and limitations. Open problems of this exciting research area of computational biology are finally considered, outlining novel perspectives for future research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.