Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25937940›Full record

ArticleISRN bioinformatics2012

Nonlinear dependence in the discovery of differentially expressed genes.

J R Deller, Hayder Radha, J Justin McCormick, Huiyan Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISRN bioinformatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J R DellerDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Michigan State University, 2120 EB, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Hayder RadhaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Michigan State University, 2120 EB, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
J Justin McCormickCarcinogenesis Laboratory, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Michigan State University, 341 FST, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Huiyan WangCollege of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Zhejiang Gongshang University, 18 Xuezheng Street, Zhejiang Province Hangzhou, 310018, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microarray data are used to determine which genes are active in response to a changing cell environment. Genes are "discovered" when they are significantly differentially expressed in the microarray data collected under the differing conditions. In one prevalent approach, all genes are assumed to satisfy a null hypothesis, ℍ 0, of no difference in expression. A false discovery (type 1 error) occurs when ℍ 0 is incorrectly rejected. The quality of a detection algorithm is assessed by estimating its number of false discoveries, 𝔉. Work involving the second-moment modeling of the z-value histogram (representing gene expression differentials) has shown significantly deleterious effects of intergene expression correlation on the estimate of 𝔉. This paper suggests that nonlinear dependencies could likewise be important. With an applied emphasis, this paper extends the "moment framework" by including third-moment skewness corrections in an estimator of 𝔉. This estimator combines observed correlation (corrected for sampling fluctuations) with the information from easily identifiable null cases. Nonlinear-dependence modeling reduces the estimation error relative to that of linear estimation. Third-moment calculations involve empirical densities of 3 × 3 covariance matrices estimated using very few samples. The principle of entropy maximization is employed to connect estimated moments to 𝔉 inference. Model results are tested with BRCA and HIV data sets and with carefully constructed simulations.

Identifiers

PMID25937940
PMCPMC4393074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.