Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25937768›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of surgical oncology2015

Review: the role of hyperthermia in treating pancreatic tumors.

Martin Roesch, Boris Mueller-Huebenthal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia for treating locally advanced unresectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancers: the role of tumor size and eddy-current heating.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2020
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Martin RoeschResearch & Development Celsius42+, Mannheim, Germany.
Boris Mueller-HuebenthalOncology, Paracelsus Klinik, Zurich-Richterswil, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is only marginal improvement in outcome of treating pancreatic cancer in the last two decades. Time to open up and have a fresh look at complementary adjuvant treatment options. Hyperthermia may be one such option. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) predominantly as a intrasurgical procedure has already proved its justification. Non-invasive loco regional hyperthermia as complement to either chemo or radiation has not yet reached a comparable status of evidence. However the potential to eventually grow into such evidence is already clearly observable. This review presents the various methodologies available for hyperthermia, covers the initial clinical data that has been published and gives an outlook to what can be expected in the next 2-3 years to come. Hyperthermia has the potential to significantly prolong life expectancies and this while maintaining a satisfying quality of life!

Indexed as

Adjuvant heat treatmentHyperthermiaPalliative pain reductionPancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID25937768
PMCPMC4412860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.