Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25937686›Full record

ArticleEthology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie2014

Tolerance and Social Facilitation in the Foraging Behaviour of Free-Ranging Crows (

Rachael Miller, Martina Schiestl, Andrew Whiten, Christine Schwab, Thomas Bugnyar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Occurrence of Chlamydiae in Corvids in Northeast Italy.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  8. Corvids in Urban Environments: A Systematic Global Literature Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Behavioural Type Affects Space Use in a Wild Population of Crows (Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Counting crows: population structure and group size variation in an urban population of crows.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rachael MillerDepartment of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria ; Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK ; Tiergarten Schonbrunn, Vienna, Austria ; Royal Zoological Society of Scotland, Edinburgh Zoo, Edinburgh, UK.
Martina SchiestlDepartment of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria ; Tiergarten Schonbrunn, Vienna, Austria.
Andrew WhitenCentre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Christine SchwabDepartment of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria ; Tiergarten Schonbrunn, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas BugnyarDepartment of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria ; Tiergarten Schonbrunn, Vienna, Austria.
University of Vienna · ATRoyal Zoological Society of Scotland · GBUniversity of St Andrews · GB

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF Y 366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social foraging provides animals with opportunities to gain knowledge about available food. Studies indicate that animals are influenced by social context during exploration and are able to learn socially. Carrion and hooded crows, which are opportunistic generalists with flexible social systems, have so far received little focus in this area. We combined observational and experimental approaches to investigate social interactions during foraging and social influences on crow behaviour within a free-ranging population at Vienna Zoo, which included 115 individually marked crows. We expected the crows to be tolerant of conspecifics during foraging due to high food abundance. We predicted that social context would enhance familiar object exploration, as well as a specific foraging strategy: predation by crows on other species. We found that crows were highly tolerant of one another, as reflected by their high rates of cofeeding - where they fed directly beside conspecific(s) - relative to affiliative or agonistic interactions. Evidence for social facilitation - when the observer's behaviour is affected by the mere presence of a model - was found in both object exploration and predation behaviour. Specifically, crows touched the objects more frequently when others were present (whilst only approaching the objects when alone), and conspecifics were present more frequently during predation events involving the high-risk target species. Evidence for enhancement during object exploration - where the observer's attention is drawn to a place or object by a model's actions - was not confirmed in this context. Our results highlight the role played by the presence of conspecifics across different contexts: natural foraging behaviour, familiar object exploration and a specific foraging strategy. To our knowledge, this is one of the first corvid studies aimed at teasing apart specific social influence and learning mechanisms in the field. These crows therefore make promising candidates for studying social learning and its consequences under naturalistic conditions.

Indexed as

corvidsfieldsocial facilitationsocial learningtolerance

Identifiers

PMID25937686
PMCPMC4415146
OpenAlexW2120429212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.