ArticleThe Ibis2015
Widespread supplementary feeding in domestic gardens explains the return of reintroduced Red Kites
Article in The Ibis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart flying in challenging skies: How Red Kites adjust wind turbine micro- and meso-avoidance across weather and experience.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- COVID-19 lockdown effects on the foraging strategies of a facultative scavenger.Biology letters · 2025Article
- Article
- Raptor research during the COVID-19 pandemic provides invaluable opportunities for conservation biology.Biological conservation · 2021Article
- The Biological Deserts Fallacy: Cities in Their Landscapes Contribute More than We Think to Regional Biodiversity.Bioscience · 2021Article
- The composition of British bird communities is associated with long-term garden bird feeding.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Human-nature interactions and the consequences and drivers of provisioning wildlife.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reintroductions are commonly used to mitigate biodiversity loss. One prominent example is that of the Red Kite
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.