Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25937488›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2016

The Pediatric Imaging, Neurocognition, and Genetics (PING) Data Repository.

Terry L Jernigan, Timothy T Brown, Donald J Hagler, Natacha Akshoomoff, Hauke Bartsch, Erik Newman, Wesley K Thompson, Cinnamon S Bloss, Sarah S Murray, Nicholas Schork and 18 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 195 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
195citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

195 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Considerations for conducting developmental neuroimaging research on mental health topics.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  15. Associations between mathematical skills and white matter microstructure in children born preterm.Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence · 2026
    Article
  16. Upper Airway Volume Predicts Brain Structure and Cognition in Adolescents.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Article
  17. Lifespan Normative Modeling of Brain Microstructure.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

135 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Terry L JerniganCenter for Human Development, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Electronic address: tjernigan@ucsd.edu.
Timothy T BrownMultimodal Imaging Laboratory, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Donald J HaglerMultimodal Imaging Laboratory, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Natacha AkshoomoffCenter for Human Development, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Hauke BartschMultimodal Imaging Laboratory, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Erik NewmanCenter for Human Development, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Wesley K ThompsonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Stein Institute for Research on Aging, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Cinnamon S BlossThe Qualcomm Institute, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Sarah S MurrayDepartment of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Nicholas SchorkHuman Biology, J. Craig Venter Institute, USA.
David N KennedyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Joshua M KupermanMultimodal Imaging Laboratory, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Connor McCabeDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Yoonho ChungDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Ondrej LibigerThe Qualcomm Institute, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Melanie MaddoxCenter for Human Development, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
B J CaseySackler Institute for Developmental Psychobiology, Weil Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Linda ChangDepartment of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Thomas M ErnstDepartment of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Jean A FrazierDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jeffrey R GruenDepartments of Pediatrics and Genetics, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Elizabeth R SowellDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Southern California, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Tal KenetDepartment of Neurology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Walter E KaufmannBoston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Stewart MostofskyKennedy Krieger Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
David G AmaralDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Anders M DaleDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Multimodal Imaging Laboratory, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Pediatric Imaging, Neurocognition and Genetics Study

Funding

Creating a Pediatric Imaging-Genomics Data ResourceRC2DA029475 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHANG, LINDA, DALE, ANDERS M · 2009 to 2011
$9.1M
TISSUE CULTURE CORE FACILITYP30HD004147 · NICHD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI MCILVANE, WILLIAM J · 1985 to 2014
$9.1M
Exposing the Deep Content of the Publication: Knowledge Extraction for Neuroimaging in Child PsychiatryR01MH083320 · NIMH · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI FRAZIER, JEAN A, KENNEDY, DAVID NELSON · 2009 to 2020
$6.3M
Mouse Neurodevelopmental Behavior CoreU54HD090255 · NICHD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI STEVENS, BETH ANN · 2016 to 2020
$5.2M
Mapping Individual Cognitive Differences to Neural Variance and School ReadinessR01HD061414 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI JERNIGAN, TERRY L. · 2010 to 2014
$3.3M
Examination of Neurobehavioral Development Using the PING Data ResourceR01DA038958 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI AKSHOOMOFF, NATACHA, BROWN, TIMOTHY TODD · 2014 to 2016
$830k
NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD004147NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061414NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090255NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038958NIDA NIH HHS RC2 DA029475NIDA NIH HHS RC2DA029475NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main objective of the multi-site Pediatric Imaging, Neurocognition, and Genetics (PING) study was to create a large repository of standardized measurements of behavioral and imaging phenotypes accompanied by whole genome genotyping acquired from typically-developing children varying widely in age (3 to 20 years). This cross-sectional study produced sharable data from 1493 children, and these data have been described in several publications focusing on brain and cognitive development. Researchers may gain access to these data by applying for an account on the PING portal and filing a data use agreement. Here we describe the recruiting and screening of the children and give a brief overview of the assessments performed, the imaging methods applied, the genetic data produced, and the numbers of cases for whom different data types are available. We also cite sources of more detailed information about the methods and data. Finally we describe the procedures for accessing the data and for using the PING data exploration portal.

Indexed as

CognitionDatabases, FactualGeneticsNeuroimagingPediatricsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInformation DisseminationMaleMultimodal Imaging

Identifiers

PMID25937488
PMCPMC4628902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.