ArticleCell reports2015
Efficient CRISPR-Cas9-mediated generation of knockin human pluripotent stem cells lacking undesired mutations at the targeted locus.
Article in Cell reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
89 citing papers in PubMed.
- Induced pluripotent stem cells from discovery to translation.Nature medicine · 2026Review
- Circadian Behavioral and Bioluminescence Rhythms in theJournal of biological rhythms · 2026Article
- Exploring AAV-Mediated Gene Therapy for Inner Ear Diseases: from Preclinical Success to Clinical Potential.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Low Efficiency of Homology-Independent Targeted Integration for CRISPR/Cas9 Correction in the Vicinity of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Targeting TDP-43 Proteinopathy in hiPSC-Derived Mutated hNPCs with Mitoxantrone Drugs and miRNAs.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Article
- MAGIK: A rapid and efficient method to create lineage-specific reporters in human pluripotent stem cells.Stem cell reports · 2024Article
- Co-delivery of Cas9 mRNA and guide RNAs for editing of LGMN gene represses breast cancer cell metastasis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- CRISPR-Cas9 immune-evasive hESCs are rejected following transplantation into immunocompetent mice.Frontiers in genome editing · 2024Article
- Integration of xeno-free single-cell cloning in CRISPR-mediated DNA editing of human iPSCs improves homogeneity and methodological efficiency of cellular disease modeling.Stem cell reports · 2023Article
- Generation of inactivated IL2RG and RAG1 monkeys with severe combined immunodeficiency using base editing.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Article
- Enrichment strategies to enhance genome editing.Journal of biomedical science · 2023Review
- Developments in stem cell-derived islet replacement therapy for treating type 1 diabetes.Cell stem cell · 2023Review
- Review
- In search of an ideal template for therapeutic genome editing: A review of current developments for structure optimization.Frontiers in genome editing · 2023Review
- Genome Editing and Pathological Cardiac Hypertrophy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Detecting and measuring of GPCR signaling - comparison of human induced pluripotent stem cells and immortal cell lines.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells and Genome-Editing Tools in Determining Gene Function and Therapy for Inherited Retinal Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- A reference human induced pluripotent stem cell line for large-scale collaborative studies.Cell stem cell · 2022Article
- Current strategies employed in the manipulation of gene expression for clinical purposes.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Review
29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The CRISPR-Cas9 system has the potential to revolutionize genome editing in human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs), but its advantages and pitfalls are still poorly understood. We systematically tested the ability of CRISPR-Cas9 to mediate reporter gene knockin at 16 distinct genomic sites in hPSCs. We observed efficient gene targeting but found that targeted clones carried an unexpectedly high frequency of insertion and deletion (indel) mutations at both alleles of the targeted gene. These indels were induced by Cas9 nuclease, as well as Cas9-D10A single or dual nickases, and often disrupted gene function. To overcome this problem, we designed strategies to physically destroy or separate CRISPR target sites at the targeted allele and developed a bioinformatic pipeline to identify and eliminate clones harboring deleterious indels at the other allele. This two-pronged approach enables the reliable generation of knockin hPSC reporter cell lines free of unwanted mutations at the targeted locus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.