Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25937277›Full record

ArticleCell reports2015

Somatosensory substrates of flight control in bats.

Kara L Marshall, Mohit Chadha, Laura A deSouza, Susanne J Sterbing-D'Angelo, Cynthia F Moss, Ellen A Lumpkin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evolution of sensory organs: Lessons from walking fish.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Sensory Feedback and the Dynamic Control of Movement.Annual review of neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Anchoring like octopus: biologically inspired soft artificial sucker.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Whiskers aid anemotaxis in rats.Science advances · 2016
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Mammalian touch catches up.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kara L MarshallDepartments of Dermatology and Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Mohit ChadhaProgram in Neuroscience and Cognitive Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Laura A deSouzaProgram in Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Susanne J Sterbing-D'AngeloInstitute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Cynthia F MossProgram in Neuroscience and Cognitive Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA; Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA. Electronic address: cynthia.moss@jhu.edu.
Ellen A LumpkinDepartments of Dermatology and Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA; Program in Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA. Electronic address: eal2166@columbia.edu.
Columbia University · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Understanding the Biology of Chronic Ulcers: Histological and Molecular Basis...P30AR044535 · NIAMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BICKERS, DAVID RINSEY · 1997 to 2015
$6.9M
NEUROBIOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32HD007430 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GRUEBER, WESLEY B · 1999 to 2017
$6.8M
Peripheral Mechanisms Governing Tactile Encoding During Normal Target RemodelingR01NS073119 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GERLING, GREGORY JOHN, LUMPKIN, ELLEN A · 2010 to 2016
$2.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR044535NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007430NICHD NIH HHS T32HD007430NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073119NINDS NIH HHS R01NS073119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flight maneuvers require rapid sensory integration to generate adaptive motor output. Bats achieve remarkable agility with modified forelimbs that serve as airfoils while retaining capacity for object manipulation. Wing sensory inputs provide behaviorally relevant information to guide flight; however, components of wing sensory-motor circuits have not been analyzed. Here, we elucidate the organization of wing innervation in an insectivore, the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus. We demonstrate that wing sensory innervation differs from other vertebrate forelimbs, revealing a peripheral basis for the atypical topographic organization reported for bat somatosensory nuclei. Furthermore, the wing is innervated by an unusual complement of sensory neurons poised to report airflow and touch. Finally, we report that cortical neurons encode tactile and airflow inputs with sparse activity patterns. Together, our findings identify neural substrates of somatosensation in the bat wing and imply that evolutionary pressures giving rise to mammalian flight led to unusual sensorimotor projections.

Indexed as

AnimalsChiropteraFlight, AnimalNeuroanatomical Tract-Tracing TechniquesSomatosensory CortexTouchWings, Animal

Identifiers

PMID25937277
PMCPMC4643944
OpenAlexW2070899624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.