Whole-genome sequencing in critically ill infants and emerging ethical challenges.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Measures of Utility Among Studies of Genomic Medicine for Critically Ill Infants: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2022
   Pooled it
2. Influence of Genetic Information on Neonatologists' Decisions: A Psychological Experiment.Pediatrics · 2022
   Trial
3. Use of genetic risks in pediatric organ transplantation listing decisions: A national survey.Pediatric transplantation · 2019
   Article
4. Clinical exome sequencing in France and Quebec: what are the challenges? What does the future hold?Life sciences, society and policy · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Whole-genome sequencing for identification of Mendelian disorders in critically ill infants: a retrospective analysis of diagnostic and clinical findings.2015

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as