ArticleZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2015
[Immunohistochemical detections of EGFR status in NSCLC].
Article in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) respond well to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a simple and widely used technique in clinical pathology laboratories. IHC also features cost effectiveness and rapid detection of EGFR mutations compared with molecular methods. This study aims to determine the accuracy of IHC for EGFR mutation detection in NSCLC.
methodsSpecimens (obtained from surgery or biopsy) from 97 NSCLC cases were stained through IHC with mutation-specific antibodies. The clinicopathological features of patients with positive immunostaining results were analyzed. Positive specimens were subjected to liquid chip technology to detect the actual EGFR status. Forty NSCLC specimens obtained from surgery and confirmed to have EGFR mutations through liquid chip technology were collected. These specimens were then subjected to IHC analyses with mutation-specific antibodies. The sensitivity of IHC in detecting EGFR mutations was calculated.
resultsSeventeen of the 97 NSCLC specimens were stained positive, and positive results were mostly observed in females, patients with adenocarcinoma, and non-smokers. About 76.9% of specimens with positive IHC results harbored mutations. The sensitivity of IHC was 40% among the 40 cases identified as containing EGFR mutations through liquid chip technology.
conclusionsThe strong positive immunostaining result is accurate, but the sensitivity of the method may not be optimal and significantly varies in different studies. The widespread application of IHC in clinics must be further investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.