Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25936684›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2015

Dose and pulse sequence considerations for hyperpolarized (129)Xe ventilation MRI.

Mu He, Scott H Robertson, S Sivaram Kaushik, Matthew S Freeman, Rohan S Virgincar, John Davies, Jane Stiles, William M Foster, H Page McAdams, Bastiaan Driehuys

Registry-linked trialAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01280994 (Hyperpolarized 129Xe MR Imaging of the Lung Function in Healthy Volunteers and Subjects With Pulmonary Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01280994 phase2recruitingnot on this map

Hyperpolarized 129Xe MR Imaging of the Lung Function in Healthy Volunteers and Subjects With Pulmonary Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorBastiaan DriehuysRan2011 to 2030Enrolled445ConditionsInterstitial Lung DiseaseArmsHyperpolarized 129Xenon Gas
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. UltrasensitiveAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Quantifying Regional Radiation-Induced Lung Injury in Patients Using HyperpolarizedInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2024
    Article
  7. HyperpolarizedJHLT open · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Bias field correction in hyperpolarizedMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Enabling Clinical Technologies for HyperpolarizedAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2021
    Review
  18. HyperpolarizedRadiology · 2021
    Article
  19. Regional Gas Exchange Measured byJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2021
    Article
  20. Low-Flammable Parahydrogen-Polarized MRI Contrast Agents.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mu HeCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Scott H RobertsonCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
S Sivaram KaushikCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Matthew S FreemanCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Rohan S VirgincarCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
John DaviesDepartment of Medicine Pulmonary, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Jane StilesDepartment of Medicine Pulmonary, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
William M FosterDepartment of Medicine Pulmonary, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
H Page McAdamsMedical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Medicine Pulmonary, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Bastiaan DriehuysCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: bastiaan.driehuys@duke.edu.

Funding

Duke CTSA (Composite)UL1TR001117 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E, LI, JENNIFER S · 2013 to 2017
$41.3M
X-RAY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT WITH/WITHOUT LIVE ANIMALSP41RR005959 · NCRR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DZAU, VICTOR J · 1990 to 2011
$16.0M
INTEGRATED CENTER FOR IN VIVO MICROSCOPYP41EB015897 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, GEORGE ALLAN · 2012 to 2017
$7.4M
Early Detection of Changes in Pulmonary Gas Exchange by Hyperpolarized Xe MRIR01HL105643 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Bastiaan Driehuys · 2011 to 2026
$6.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001117NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR001117NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR005959NHLBI NIH HHS HL105643NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL105643NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of hyperpolarized (129)Xe dose on image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and ventilation defect conspicuity on both multi-slice gradient echo and isotropic 3D-radially acquired ventilation MRI. MATERIALS AND

methodsTen non-smoking older subjects (ages 60.8±7.9years) underwent hyperpolarized (HP) (129)Xe ventilation MRI using both GRE and 3D-radial acquisitions, each tested using a 71ml (high) and 24ml (low) dose equivalent (DE) of fully polarized, fully enriched (129)Xe. For all images SNR and ventilation defect percentage (VDP) were calculated.

resultsNormalized SNR (SNRn), obtained by dividing SNR by voxel volume and dose was higher for high-DE GRE acquisitions (SNRn=1.9±0.8ml(-2)) than low-DE GRE scans (SNRn=0.8±0.2ml(-2)). Radially acquired images exhibited a more consistent, albeit lower SNRn (High-DE: SNRn=0.5±0.1ml(-2), low-DE: SNRn=0.5±0.2ml(-2)). VDP was indistinguishable across all scans.

conclusionsThese results suggest that images acquired using the high-DE GRE sequence provided the highest SNRn, which was in agreement with previous reports in the literature. 3D-radial images had lower SNRn, but have advantages for visual display, monitoring magnetization dynamics, and visualizing physiological gradients. By evaluating normalized SNR in the context of dose-equivalent formalism, it should be possible to predict (129)Xe dose requirements and quantify the benefits of more efficient transmit/receive coils, field strengths, and pulse sequences.

Indexed as

Pulmonary VentilationSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAdministration, InhalationAlgorithmsContrast MediaDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalLungMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsContrast MediaXenon IsotopesHyperpolarized (129)Xe MRIPulse sequenceSignal-to-noise ratioVentilation defect

Identifiers

PMID25936684
PMCPMC4466055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.