Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25936647›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2015

Excellent prognosis following endoscopic resection of patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors despite the frequent presence of lymphovascular invasion.

Masau Sekiguchi, Shigeki Sekine, Taku Sakamoto, Yosuke Otake, Takeshi Nakajima, Takahisa Matsuda, Hirokazu Taniguchi, Ryoji Kushima, Yuichiro Ohe, Yutaka Saito

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis of type 1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors in a large Japanese national cohort.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Masau SekiguchiEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. masekigu@ncc.go.jp.
Shigeki SekinePathology and Clinical Laboratory Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. ssekine@ncc.go.jp.
Taku SakamotoEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yosuke OtakeEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi NakajimaEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahisa MatsudaEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirokazu TaniguchiPathology and Clinical Laboratory Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Ryoji KushimaPathology and Clinical Laboratory Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Yuichiro OheAdvanced Clinical Research of Cancer, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaka SaitoEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
National Cancer Center Hospital East · JPJuntendo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic resection (ER) has been increasingly used for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs); however, only limited data are available on its long-term outcomes. This study analyzed the long-term outcomes of rectal NETs treated by ER and characterized potential risk factors for metastasis in these cases, with emphasis on lymphovascular invasion.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological features and outcomes of 86 patients with 90 rectal NETs who had been treated by ER. Lymphovascular invasion was reevaluated using elastic-staining and double-staining immunohistochemistry.

resultsEn bloc resection with tumor-free margins was achieved in 87 lesions (96.7%). The median tumor size was 5 mm (range 2-13), and all the lesions were confined to the submucosal layer. The Ki-67 index was less than 3% in all the lesions, which were therefore classified as NET G1. Elastic-staining and double-staining immunohistochemistry revealed the presence of lymphatic and venous invasion in 23 (25.6%) and 35 lesions (36.7%), respectively. Collectively, lymphatic and/or vascular invasion was identified in 42 lesions (46.7%). All cases were followed up without additional surgery, and no metastasis or recurrence was detected during the median follow-up period of 67.5 months.

conclusionsThis study showed an excellent long-term prognosis following ER of patients with rectal NETs, confirming that ER is a valid treatment option for small rectal NETs. The present study also revealed highly prevalent lymphovascular invasion even in minute rectal NETs; this observation raises a question regarding its significance as a risk factor for metastasis.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood VesselsEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeovascularization, PathologicNeuroendocrine TumorsPrognosisRectal NeoplasmsEndoscopic resectionLymphovascular invasionRectal neuroendocrine tumor

Identifiers

PMID25936647
OpenAlexW1988843368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.