Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25935849›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2015

I-RREACH: an engagement and assessment tool for improving implementation readiness of researchers, organizations and communities in complex interventions.

Marion Maar, Karen Yeates, Marcia Barron, Diane Hua, Peter Liu, Margaret Moy Lum-Kwong, Nancy Perkins, Jessica Sleeth, Joshua Tobe, Mary Jo Wabano and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marion MaarFaculty of Medicine, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada. mmaar@nosm.ca.
Karen YeatesDepartment of Medicine, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada. yeatesk@queensu.ca.
Marcia BarronRiverstone Research Consulting, Guelph, ON, Canada. marcbarron12@gmail.com.
Diane HuaDepartment of Nephrology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Diane.Hua@sunnybrook.ca.
Peter LiuUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada. PLiu@ottawaheart.ca.
Margaret Moy Lum-KwongDepartment of Research, Advocacy and Health Promotion, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada. mmoylumkwong@gmail.com.
Nancy PerkinsDepartment of Nephrology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Nancy.Perkins@sunnybrook.ca.
Jessica SleethDepartment of Medicine, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada. jessica.sleeth@queensu.ca.
Joshua TobeDepartment of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada. joshuasamueltobe@gmail.com.
Mary Jo WabanoWikwemikong Health Centre, Wikwemikong, ON, Canada. mjwabano@wikyhealth.ca.
Pamela WilliamsonNoojmowin Teg Health Centre, Little Current, ON, Canada. p.williamson@noojmowin-teg.ca.
Sheldon W TobeFaculty of Medicine, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada. Sheldon.Tobe@sunnybrook.ca.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-communicable chronic diseases are the leading causes of mortality globally, and nearly 80% of these deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In high-income countries (HICs), inequitable distribution of resources affects poorer and otherwise disadvantaged groups including Aboriginal peoples. Cardiovascular mortality in high-income countries has recently begun to fall; however, these improvements are not realized among citizens in LMICs or those subgroups in high-income countries who are disadvantaged in the social determinants of health including Aboriginal people. It is critical to develop multi-faceted, affordable and realistic health interventions in collaboration with groups who experience health inequalities. Based on community-based participatory research (CBPR), we aimed to develop implementation tools to guide complex interventions to ensure that health gains can be realized in low-resource environments.

methodsWe developed the I-RREACH (Intervention and Research Readiness Engagement and Assessment of Community Health Care) tool to guide implementation of interventions in low-resource environments. We employed CBPR and a consensus methodology to (1) develop the theoretical basis of the tool and (2) to identify key implementation factor domains; then, we (3) collected participant evaluation data to validate the tool during implementation.

resultsThe I-RREACH tool was successfully developed using a community-based consensus method and is rooted in participatory principles, equalizing the importance of the knowledge and perspectives of researchers and community stakeholders while encouraging respectful dialogue. The I-RREACH tool consists of three phases: fact finding, stakeholder dialogue and community member/patient dialogue. The evaluation for our first implementation of I-RREACH by participants was overwhelmingly positive, with 95% or more of participants indicating comfort with and support for the process and the dialogue it creates.

conclusionsThe I-RREACH tool was designed to (1) pinpoint key domains required for dialogue between the community and the research team to facilitate implementation of complex health interventions and research projects and (2) to identify existing strengths and areas requiring further development for effective implementation. I-RREACH has been found to be easily adaptable to diverse geographical and cultural settings and can be further adapted to other complex interventions. Further research should include the potential use of the I-RREACH tool in the development of blue prints for scale-up of successful interventions, particularly in low-resource environments.

Indexed as

Indians, North AmericanPoverty AreasCanadaCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity Health WorkersDecision Support TechniquesDeveloping CountriesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Status DisparitiesHumansHypertensionResearch DesignResidence CharacteristicsRisk FactorsSocial Determinants of HealthTanzania

Identifiers

PMID25935849
PMCPMC4424962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.