Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25935751›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2015

Musculoskeletal injuries in British Army recruits: a prospective study of diagnosis-specific incidence and rehabilitation times.

Jagannath Sharma, Julie P Greeves, Mark Byers, Alexander N Bennett, Iain R Spears

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
30.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries in military personnel: a systematic review with meta-analysis.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome in Novice and Recreational Runners: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jagannath SharmaMedical Centre Defence Primary Healthcare, Infantry Training Centre Catterick Garrison, DL9 3PS, North Yorkshire, UK. jagannath.sharma706@mod.uk.
Julie P GreevesDepartment of Occupational Medicine, HQ Army Recruiting and Training Division, Trenchard Lines, SN9 6BE, Upavon, Wilts, UK. ARTD-OccMed-SSO@mod.uk.
Mark ByersMedical Centre Defence Primary Healthcare, Infantry Training Centre Catterick Garrison, DL9 3PS, North Yorkshire, UK. DPHCN-ITC-smo@mod.uk.
Alexander N BennettAcademic Department of Military Rehabilitation DMRC Headley Court, KT18 6JW, Surrey, UK. DMRC-ConsultantRR3@mod.uk.
Iain R SpearsSchool of Social Sciences and Law, Teesside University, TS1 3BA, Middlesbrough, UK. i.spears@tees.ac.uk.
Teesside University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMusculoskeletal injuries during initial military training are a significant medical problem facing military organisations globally. In order to develop an injury management programme, this study aims to quantify the incidence and rehabilitation times for injury specific diagnoses.

methodsThis was a prospective follow-up study of musculoskeletal injuries in 6608 British Army recruits during a 26-week initial military training programme over a 2-year period. Incidence and rehabilitation times for injury specific diagnoses were recorded and analysed.

resultsDuring the study period the overall incidence of musculoskeletal injuries was 48.6%, and the most common diagnosis was iliotibial band syndrome (6.2%). A significant proportion of the injuries occurred during the first 11 weeks of the programme. The longest rehabilitation times were for stress fractures of the femur, calcaneus and tibia (116 ± 17 days, 92 ± 12 days, and 85 ± 11 days, respectively). The combination of high incidence and lengthy rehabilitation indicates that medial tibial stress syndrome had the greatest impact on training, accounting for almost 20% of all days spent in rehabilitation.

conclusionWhen setting prevention priorities consideration should be given to both the incidence of specific injury diagnoses and their associated time to recovery.

Indexed as

AdolescentCohort StudiesFollow-Up StudiesFractures, StressHumansIncidenceKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMilitary PersonnelMusculoskeletal DiseasesMusculoskeletal SystemPhysical Education and TrainingProspective StudiesRehabilitationTime FactorsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID25935751
PMCPMC4443544
OpenAlexW1989205873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.