Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25935456›Full record

ReviewClinical rheumatology2015

Ankylosis in ankylosing spondylitis: current concepts.

Nigil Haroon

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical rheumatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparison of MRI-defined back muscles volume between patients with ankylosing spondylitis and control patients with chronic back pain: age and spinopelvic alignment matched study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nigil HaroonUniversity of Toronto, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, 1E-425, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, M5T2S8, Canada, Nigil.Haroon@uhn.ca.
Toronto Western Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is the most common form of spondyloarthritis and is characterized by both inflammation and new bone formation. Despite many years of arduous efforts, we still do not clearly understand the pathogenesis of AS. The mechanisms behind new bone formation have been especially challenging to decipher due to the difficulty in obtaining tissue from spinal joints. The link between inflammation and bone formation looks obvious, but how inflammation drives spinal fusion is not evident. There are now two genes linked to prostaglandins (PG) that could be involved in AS pathogenesis. The first one is PTGER4 that codes for the EP4 receptor for PGE2 and the other one is PTGS1 that codes for prostaglandin-endoperoxide syntase 1 or cyclogenase 1. The bone morphogenic protein and Wnt signaling pathways could be important in signaling increased bone formation in AS. The disease-modifying potential of anti-inflammatories and tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors is discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnkylosisBone Morphogenetic ProteinsCyclooxygenase 1HumansOsteogenesisReceptors, Prostaglandin E, EP4 SubtypeSpondylitis, AnkylosingWnt Signaling PathwayBone Morphogenetic ProteinsCyclooxygenase 1Receptors, Prostaglandin E, EP4 Subtype

Identifiers

PMID25935456
OpenAlexW2038012841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.