Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25935124›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2015

Understanding the effects of pre-processing on extracted signal features from gait accelerometry signals.

Alexandre Millecamps, Kristin A Lowry, Jennifer S Brach, Subashan Perera, Mark S Redfern, Ervin Sejdić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. DUI Detection From Gait Using a Multichannel 1DCNN-Attention-BiLSTM Framework.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Acceleration Gait Measures as Proxies for Motor Skill of Walking: A Narrative Review.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandre MillecampsDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, 3700 O׳Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Kristin A LowryDeparment of Physical Therapy, Des Moines University, Des Moines, IA 50312, USA.
Jennifer S BrachDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Subashan PereraDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Mark S RedfernDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Ervin SejdićDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, 3700 O׳Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA,. Electronic address: esejdic@ieee.org.
University of Pittsburgh · USDes Moines University · US

Funding

VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JENNIFER S BRACH · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827NIA NIH HHS P30AG024827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gait accelerometry is an important approach for gait assessment. Previous contributions have adopted various pre-processing approaches for gait accelerometry signals, but none have thoroughly investigated the effects of such pre-processing operations on the obtained results. Therefore, this paper investigated the influence of pre-processing operations on signal features extracted from gait accelerometry signals. These signals were collected from 35 participants aged over 65years: 14 of them were healthy controls (HC), 10 had Parkinson׳s disease (PD) and 11 had peripheral neuropathy (PN). The participants walked on a treadmill at preferred speed. Signal features in time, frequency and time-frequency domains were computed for both raw and pre-processed signals. The pre-processing stage consisted of applying tilt correction and denoising operations to acquired signals. We first examined the effects of these operations separately, followed by the investigation of their joint effects. Several important observations were made based on the obtained results. First, the denoising operation alone had almost no effects in comparison to the trends observed in the raw data. Second, the tilt correction affected the reported results to a certain degree, which could lead to a better discrimination between groups. Third, the combination of the two pre-processing operations yielded similar trends as the tilt correction alone. These results indicated that while gait accelerometry is a valuable approach for the gait assessment, one has to carefully adopt any pre-processing steps as they alter the observed findings.

Indexed as

GaitSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedWalkingAccelerometryAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleParkinson DiseasePeripheral Nervous System DiseasesGait accelerometryHealthy controlsParkinson׳s diseasePeripheral neuropathyPre-processing effectsSignal features

Identifiers

PMID25935124
PMCPMC4466053
OpenAlexW1980261706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.