Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25934177›Full record

Observational studyBMC endocrine disorders2015

Achievement of individualized treatment targets in patients with comorbid type-2 diabetes and hypertension: 6 months results of the DIALOGUE registry.

Roland E Schmieder, Anselm K Gitt, Cornelia Koch, Peter Bramlage, Taoufik Ouarrak, Diethelm Tschöpe, DIALOGUE study group

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC endocrine disorders, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roland E SchmiederMedizinische Klinik 4, Nephrologie und Hypertensiologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. roland.schmieder@uk-erlangen.de.
Anselm K GittStiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany. gitta@klilu.de.
Cornelia KochNovartis Pharma GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany. cornelia.koch@novartis.com.
Peter BramlageInstitut für Pharmakologie und Präventive Medizin, Mahlow, Germany. peter.bramlage@ippmed.de.
Taoufik OuarrakStiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany. ouarrak@ihf.de.
Diethelm TschöpeHerz- und Diabeteszentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany. diethelm.tschoepe@ruhr-uni-bochum.de.
DIALOGUE study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension have increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). We studied individualized treatment targets and their achievement in clinical practice.

methodsDIALOGUE is a prospective, multi-center registry in patients with both T2DM and hypertension.

resultsPatients (n = 6,586) had a baseline fasting glucose (8.5 ± 2.8 mmol/l), postprandial glucose (10.9 ± 3.4 mmol/l), and HbA1c (7.8 ± 2.1%) levels indicated poor glycemic control. Baseline systolic and diastolic BP were 140.3 ± 15.7 and 82.6 ± 9.5, respectively. Patients were categorized by HbA1c treatment goals: ≤6.5% (strict), >6.5 to ≤7.0% (medium), and >7.0 to ≤7.5% (loose). When considering systolic BP (SBP) targets (≤130 mmHg [strict], >130 to ≤135 mmHg [medium], and >135 to ≤140 mmHg [loose]), patients with strict SBP treatment goals displayed similar characteristics to those with strict HbA1c targets. Although approximately 70% of patients received both strict HbA1c and SBP targeting, overall treatment goals remained unmet in all HbA1c target groups at the 6-month follow-up. SBP targets were not reached in the strict and medium groups, but were achieved in the loose treatment group. Specific predictors for choosing loose SBP or HbA1c treatment goals were identified, including SBP/HbA1c levels and various comorbidities.

conclusionsIndividualized glucose and BP targets were selected by treating physicians based on patient characteristics and overall comorbidity. While treatment goals were not consistently met using various antidiabetic and antihypertensive therapies, our analyses indicated that the strictly targeted patient populations maintained lower overall HbA1c and SBP levels at 6 months.

Indexed as

AchievementAgedAged, 80 and overComorbidityDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleFollow-Up StudiesGoalsHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care PlanningProspective StudiesRegistries

Identifiers

PMID25934177
PMCPMC4426603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.