Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25933675›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2015

Next-generation sequencing-based panel testing for myeloid neoplasms.

Frank C Kuo, Fei Dong

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. SystematicBlood advances · 2017
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Clonal hematopoiesis.Seminars in hematology · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Frank C KuoCenter for Advanced Molecular Diagnostics, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA, fkuo@partners.org.
Fei Dong

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our ability to interrogate a broad array of genetic alterations in myeloid neoplasm has increased significantly with the advance in next-generation sequencing (NGS). In addition to morphologic examination, flow cytometry, and cytogenetics, NGS-based testing can add additional information to the diagnostic workup. More than a dozen myeloid-focused NGS-based panels are now available from commercial and academic laboratories. In this review, we examine the content of these panels in the context of our current understanding of driver alterations in myeloid neoplasms. With improved turnaround time, decreasing costs, and an expanding knowledge of the therapeutic and prognostic significance of the detected variants, NGS-based panel testing is likely to play a major role in the management of patients with myeloid neoplasm in the coming decade.

Indexed as

Hematologic NeoplasmsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMyeloproliferative DisordersSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.