Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25933414›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

The Costs of Delivering Integrated HIV and Sexual Reproductive Health Services in Limited Resource Settings.

Carol Dayo Obure, Sedona Sweeney, Vanessa Darsamo, Christine Michaels-Igbokwe, Lorna Guinness, Fern Terris-Prestholt, Esther Muketo, Zelda Nhlabatsi, Integra Initiative, Charlotte E Warren and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Carol Dayo ObureDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Sedona SweeneyDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Vanessa DarsamoDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Christine Michaels-IgbokweDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Lorna GuinnessDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Fern Terris-PrestholtDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Esther MuketoFamily Health Options Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Zelda NhlabatsiFamily Life Association of Swaziland, Manzini, Swaziland.
Integra Initiative
Charlotte E WarrenPopulation Council, Nairobi, Kenya.
Susannah MayhewDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Charlotte WattsDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Anna VassallDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo present evidence on the total costs and unit costs of delivering six integrated sexual reproductive health and HIV services in a high and medium HIV prevalence setting, in order to support policy makers and planners scaling up these essential services.

designA retrospective facility based costing study conducted in 40 non-government organization and public health facilities in Kenya and Swaziland.

methodsEconomic and financial costs were collected retrospectively for the year 2010/11, from each study site with an aim to estimate the cost per visit of six integrated HIV and SRH services. A full cost analysis using a combination of bottom-up and step-down costing methods was conducted from the health provider's perspective. The main unit of analysis is the economic unit cost per visit for each service. Costs are converted to 2013 International dollars.

resultsThe mean cost per visit for the HIV/SRH services ranged from $Int 14.23 (PNC visit) to $Int 74.21 (HIV treatment visit). We found considerable variation in the unit costs per visit across settings with family planning services exhibiting the least variation ($Int 6.71-52.24) and STI treatment and HIV treatment visits exhibiting the highest variation in unit cost ranging from ($Int 5.44-281.85) and ($Int 0.83-314.95), respectively. Unit costs of visits were driven by fixed costs while variability in visit costs across facilities was explained mainly by technology used and service maturity.

conclusionFor all services, variability in unit costs and cost components suggest that potential exists to reduce costs through better use of both human and capital resources, despite the high proportion of expenditure on drugs and medical supplies. Further work is required to explore the key drivers of efficiency and interventions that may facilitate efficiency improvements.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsHealth ResourcesHIV InfectionsHumansModels, EconomicOwnershipReproductive Health Services

Identifiers

PMID25933414
PMCPMC4416893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.