Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25932961›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2015

Uterine smooth muscle tumor analysis by comparative genomic hybridization: a useful diagnostic tool in challenging lesions.

Sabrina Croce, Agnes Ribeiro, Celine Brulard, Jean-Christophe Noel, Frederic Amant, Eberhard Stoeckle, Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheborah, Anne Floquet, Laurent Arnould, Frederic Guyon and 12 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Molecular-Based Immunohistochemical Algorithm for Uterine Leiomyosarcoma Diagnosis.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 12 institutions in 3 countries.

Sabrina Croce1] Department of Biopathology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Bordeaux, France [2] Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM) U916, Bordeaux, France.
Agnes RibeiroDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Bordeaux, France.
Celine BrulardDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Bordeaux, France.
Jean-Christophe NoelDepartment of Pathology, Clinic of Gynecopathology and Senology, Erasme University Hospital, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Frederic AmantDepartment of Oncology, Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Eberhard StoeckleDepartment of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Bordeaux, France.
Mojgan Devouassoux-ShisheborahDepartment of Pathology, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France.
Anne FloquetDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Bordeaux, France.
Laurent ArnouldDepartment of Pathology, Centre JF Leclerc, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Dijon, France.
Frederic GuyonDepartment of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Bordeaux, France.
Florence MishellanyDepartment of Pathology, Centre Jean Perrin, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Delphine GarbayDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Bordeaux, France.
Tine CuppensDepartment of Oncology, Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Michal ZikanGynaecological Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Charles University in Prague-First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Agnès LerouxDepartment of Pathology, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.
Eric FrouinDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
Pierre DuvillardDepartment of Pathology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Villejuif, France.
Philippe TerrierDepartment of Pathology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Villejuif, France.
Isabelle FarreDepartment of Pathology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Lille, France.
Isabelle ValoDepartment of Pathology, ICO Paul Papin, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Angers, France.
Gaetan M MacGroganDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Bordeaux, France.
Frederic Chibon1] Department of Biopathology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Bordeaux, France [2] Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM) U916, Bordeaux, France.
Institut Bergonié · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRKU Leuven · BECentre Georges François Leclerc · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRCentre Jean Perrin · FRCentre Oscar Lambret · FRCharles University · CZDélégation Centre-Est · FRErasmus Hospital · BEHôpital de la Croix-Rousse · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis and management of uterine smooth muscle tumors with uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) is often challenging, and genomic data on these lesions as well as on uterine smooth muscle lesions are limited. We tested the hypothesis that genomic profile determination by array-CGH could split STUMP into a benign group with scarce chromosomal alterations akin to leiomyoma and a malignant group with high chromosomal instability akin to leiomyosarcoma. Array-CGH genomic profile analysis was conducted for a series of 29 cases of uterine STUMP. A group of ten uterine leiomyomas and ten uterine leiomyosarcomas served as controls. The mean age was 50 years (range, 24-85) and the follow-up ranged from 12 to 156 months (average 70 months). Since STUMP is a heterogenous group of tumors with genomic profiles that can harbor few to many chromosomal alterations, we compared genomic indices in leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas and set a genomic index=10 threshold. Tumors with a genomic index <10 were classified as nonrecurring STUMPs and those with a genomic index >10 represented STUMPs with recurrences and unfavorable outcomes. Hence, the genomic index threshold splits the STUMP category into two groups of tumors with different outcomes: a group comparable to leiomyomas and another similar to leiomyosarcomas, but more indolent. In our STUMP series, genomic analysis by array-CGH is an innovative diagnostic tool for problematic smooth muscle uterine lesions, complementary to the morphological evaluation approach. We provide an improved classification method for distinguishing truly malignant tumors from benign lesions within the category of STUMP, especially those with equivocal morphological features.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overComparative Genomic HybridizationFemaleHumansLeiomyomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSmooth Muscle TumorUterine NeoplasmsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25932961
OpenAlexW2081691390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.