Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25932953›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Characterisation of mesothelioma-initiating cells and their susceptibility to anti-cancer agents.

Elham Alizadeh Pasdar, Michael Smits, Michael Stapelberg, Martina Bajzikova, Marina Stantic, Jacob Goodwin, Bing Yan, Jan Stursa, Jaromira Kovarova, Karishma Sachaphibulkij and 8 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Translational lung cancer research · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Elham Alizadeh PasdarSchool of Medical Science, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Michael SmitsSchool of Medical Science, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Michael StapelbergSchool of Medical Science, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Martina BajzikovaInstitute of Biotechnology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Marina StanticSchool of Medical Science, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Jacob GoodwinSchool of Medical Science, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Bing YanSchool of Medical Science, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Jan StursaBiomedical Research Center, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Jaromira KovarovaInstitute of Biotechnology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Karishma SachaphibulkijSchool of Medical Science, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Ayenachew Bezawork-GeletaSchool of Medical Science, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Margaryta SobolInstitute of Molecular Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Anatoly FilimonenkoInstitute of Molecular Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Marco TomasettiDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Renata ZobalovaSchool of Medical Science, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia; Institute of Biotechnology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel HozakInstitute of Molecular Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lan-Feng DongSchool of Medical Science, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Jiri NeuzilSchool of Medical Science, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia; Institute of Biotechnology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is an aggressive type of tumour causing high mortality. One reason for this paradigm may be the existence of a subpopulation of tumour-initiating cells (TICs) that endow MM with drug resistance and recurrence. The objective of this study was to identify and characterise a TIC subpopulation in MM cells, using spheroid cultures, mesospheres, as a model of MM TICs. Mesospheres, typified by the stemness markers CD24, ABCG2 and OCT4, initiated tumours in immunodeficient mice more efficiently than adherent cells. CD24 knock-down cells lost the sphere-forming capacity and featured lower tumorigenicity. Upon serial transplantation, mesospheres were gradually more efficiently tumrigenic with increased level of stem cell markers. We also show that mesospheres feature mitochondrial and metabolic properties similar to those of normal and cancer stem cells. Finally, we show that mesothelioma-initiating cells are highly susceptible to mitochondrially targeted vitamin E succinate. This study documents that mesospheres can be used as a plausible model of mesothelioma-initiating cells and that they can be utilised in the search for efficient agents against MM.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCD24 AntigenCell AdhesionCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDisease ProgressionGene Knockdown TechniquesHumansInhibitory Concentration 50Lung NeoplasmsMesotheliomaMesothelioma, MalignantMice, NudeMitochondriaAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCD24 AntigenTocopherols

Identifiers

PMID25932953
PMCPMC4416766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.