Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25932483›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2015

Improving awareness, accountability, and access through health coaching: qualitative study of patients' perspectives.

Clare Liddy, Sharon Johnston, Hannah Irving, Kate Nash, Natalie Ward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Experience of Telephone-Based Diabetes Health Coaching Among Community-Based Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Clare Liddy
Sharon Johnston
Hannah Irving
Kate Nash
Natalie Ward

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess patients' experiences with and perceptions of health coaching as part of their ongoing care.

designA qualitative research design using semistructured interviews that were recorded and transcribed verbatim.Setting Ottawa, Ont.

participantsEleven patients (> 18 years of age) enrolled in a health coaching pilot program who were at risk of or diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.

methodsPatients' perspectives were assessed with semistructured interviews. Interviews were conducted with 11 patients at the end of the pilot program, using a stratified sampling approach to ensure maximum variation. MAIN

findingsAll patients found the overall experience with the health coaching program to be positive. Patients believed the health coaching program was effective in increasing awareness of how diabetes affected their bodies and health, in building accountability for their health-related actions, and in improving access to care and other health resources.

conclusionPatients perceive one-on-one health coaching as an acceptable intervention in their ongoing care. Patients enrolled in the health coaching pilot program believed that there was an improvement in access to care, health literacy, and accountability,all factors considered to be precursors to behavioural change.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilitySocial ResponsibilityAdultDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Directive CounselingFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleOntarioPatient SatisfactionPilot ProjectsProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchSelf Care

Identifiers

PMID25932483
PMCPMC4369629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.