Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25932446›Full record

ArticleAnnals of laboratory medicine2015

Comparison of AdvanSure TB/NTM PCR and COBAS TaqMan MTB PCR for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex in Routine Clinical Practice.

Won-Hyung Cho, Eun-Jeong Won, Hyun-Jung Choi, Seung-Jung Kee, Jong-Hee Shin, Dong-Wook Ryang, Soon-Pal Suh

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Molecular Diagnosis of Tuberculosis.Chonnam medical journal · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Won-Hyung ChoDepartment of Surgery, Gwangju Veterans Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.
Eun-Jeong WonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.
Hyun-Jung ChoiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.
Seung-Jung KeeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.
Jong-Hee ShinDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.
Dong-Wook RyangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.
Soon-Pal SuhDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.
Chonnam National University Hospital · KRVeterans Health Service Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The AdvanSure tuberculosis/non-tuberculous mycobacterium (TB/NTM) PCR (LG Life Science, Korea) and COBAS TaqMan Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) PCR (Roche Diagnostics, USA) are commonly used in clinical microbiology laboratories. We aimed to evaluate these two commercial real-time PCR assays for detection of MTB in a large set of clinical samples over a two-year period. AdvanSure TB/NTM PCR and COBAS TaqMan MTB PCR were performed on 9,119 (75.2%) and 3,010 (24.8%) of 12,129 (9,728 respiratory and 2,401 non-respiratory) MTB specimens, with 361 (4.0%) and 102 (3.4%) acid-fast bacilli (AFB)-positive results, respectively. In MTB culture, 788 (6.5%) MTB and 514 (4.2%) NTM were identified. The total sensitivity and specificity of the AdvanSure assay were 67.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63.9-71.6) and 98.3% (95% CI, 98.0-98.6), while those of the COBAS TaqMan assay were 67.2% (95% CI, 60.0-73.8) and 98.4% (95% CI, 97.9-98.9), respectively. The sensitivities and specificities of the AdvanSure and COBAS TaqMan assays for AFB-positive and AFB-negative samples were comparable. Furthermore, the AdvanSure assay showed fewer invalid results compared with the COBAS TaqMan assay (5.0 vs. 20.4 invalid results/1,000 tests, P<0.001). AdvanSure assay represents a comparable yet more reliable method than COBAS TaqMan for the identification of mycobacteria in routine clinical microbiology.

Indexed as

DNA, BacterialHumansMycobacterium tuberculosisReagent Kits, DiagnosticReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRepublic of KoreaSensitivity and SpecificityTuberculosis, PulmonaryDNA, BacterialReagent Kits, DiagnosticAdvanSure TB/NTM PCRCOBAS TaqMan MTB PCRMycobacterium tuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID25932446
PMCPMC4390706
OpenAlexW2042221067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.