Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25932438›Full record

ArticleAnnals of laboratory medicine2015

Multiplex Real-Time PCR Method for Simultaneous Identification and Toxigenic Type Characterization of Clostridium difficile From Stool Samples.

Abdullah Kilic, Mohammad J Alam, Naradah L Tisdel, Dhara N Shah, Mehmet Yapar, Todd M Lasco, Kevin W Garey

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Laboratory Diagnostic Methods forAnnals of laboratory medicine · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  4. Toxin gene profiles and antimicrobial resistance ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Characterization ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
  7. Distribution and risk factor analysis forPediatric investigation · 2020
    Article
  8. Burden ofIranian journal of public health · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdullah KilicDepartment of Microbiology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Etlik, Ankara, Turkey. ; Department of Clinical Sciences and Administration, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA. ; St Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Mohammad J AlamDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Administration, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.
Naradah L TisdelSt Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Dhara N ShahDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Administration, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.
Mehmet YaparDepartment of Microbiology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Etlik, Ankara, Turkey.
Todd M LascoSt Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Kevin W GareyDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Administration, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA. ; St Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital · USUniversity of Houston · USTurkish Armed Forces · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to develop and validate a multiplex real-time PCR assay for simultaneous identification and toxigenic type characterization of Clostridium difficile.

methodsThe multiplex real-time PCR assay targeted and simultaneously detected triose phosphate isomerase (tpi) and binary toxin (cdtA) genes, and toxin A (tcdA) and B (tcdB) genes in the first and sec tubes, respectively. The results of multiplex real-time PCR were compared to those of the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay, targeting the tcdB gene alone. The toxigenic culture was used as the reference, where toxin genes were detected by multiplex real-time PCR.

resultsA total of 351 stool samples from consecutive patients were included in the study. Fifty-five stool samples (15.6%) were determined to be positive for the presence of C. difficile by using multiplex real-time PCR. Of these, 48 (87.2%) were toxigenic (46 tcdA and tcdB-positive, two positive for only tcdB) and 11 (22.9%) were cdtA-positive. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of the multiplex real-time PCR compared with the toxigenic culture were 95.6%, 98.6%, 91.6%, and 99.3%, respectively. The analytical sensitivity of the multiplex real-time PCR assay was determined to be 10(3) colony forming unit (CFU)/g spiked stool sample and 0.0625 pg genomic DNA from culture. Analytical specificity determined by using 15 enteric and non-clostridial reference strains was 100%.

conclusionsThe multiplex real-time PCR assay accurately detected C. difficile isolates from diarrheal stool samples and characterized its toxin genes in a single PCR run.

Indexed as

ADP Ribose TransferasesBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsClostridioides difficileDNA, BacterialEnterotoxinsFecesHumansMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionProspective StudiesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionTriose-Phosphate Isomeraseactin-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase, ClostridiumADP Ribose TransferasesBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsDNA, BacterialEnterotoxinstcdA protein, Clostridium difficiletoxB protein, Clostridium difficileTriose-Phosphate IsomeraseBinary toxinClostridium difficileMultiplex real-time PCRToxin variant strains

Identifiers

PMID25932438
PMCPMC4390698
OpenAlexW2071908449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.