Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25932349›Full record

ArticlePLoS currents2015

Control of a Reassortant Pandemic 2009 H1N1 Influenza Virus Outbreak in an Intensive Swine Breeding Farm: Effect of Vaccination and Enhanced Farm Management Practices.

Lapo Mughini-Gras, Maria Serena Beato, Giorgia Angeloni, Isabella Monne, Filippo Buniolo, Federica Zuliani, Matteo Morini, Alberto Castellan, Lebana Bonfanti, Stefano Marangon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS currents, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lapo Mughini-GrasIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), Padua, Italy; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Infectious Disease Control (CIb), Bilthoven, The Netherlands; Utrecht University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maria Serena BeatoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), Padua, Italy.
Giorgia AngeloniIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), Padua, Italy.
Isabella MonneIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), Padua, Italy.
Filippo BunioloIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), Padua, Italy.
Federica ZulianiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), Padua, Italy.
Matteo MoriniIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), Padua, Italy.
Alberto CastellanFreelance DVM, Treviso, Italy.
Lebana BonfantiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), Padua, Italy.
Stefano MarangonIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), Padua, Italy.
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie · ITAzienda ULSS 9 TREVISO · ITNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Influenza A viruses in swine cause considerable economic losses and raise concerns about their zoonotic potential. The current paucity of thorough empirical assessments of influenza A virus infection levels in swine herds under different control interventions hinders our understanding of their effectiveness. Between 2012 and 2013, recurrent outbreaks of respiratory disease caused by a reassortant pandemic 2009 H1N1 (H1N1pdm) virus were registered in a swine breeding farm in North-East Italy, providing the opportunity to assess an outbreak response plan based on vaccination and enhanced farm management. All sows/gilts were vaccinated with a H1N1pdm-specific vaccine, biosecurity was enhanced, weaning cycles were lengthened, and cross-fostering of piglets was banned. All tested piglets had maternally-derived antibodies at 30 days of age and were detectable in 5.3% of ~90 day-old piglets. There was a significant reduction in H1N1pdm RT-PCR detections after the intervention. Although our study could not fully determine the extent to which the observed trends in seropositivity or RT-PCR positivity among piglets were due to the intervention or to the natural course of the disease in the herd, we provided suggestive evidence that the applied measures were useful in controlling the outbreak, even without an all-in/all-out system, while keeping farm productivity at full.

Indexed as

H1N1Influenzaoutbreak controlreassortantswinevaccination

Identifiers

PMID25932349
PMCPMC4405187
OpenAlexW2050539092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.