ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Phase II multi-center clinical study on using S-1 to treat advanced breast cancer after resistance to anthracycline and taxane drugs in Chinese patients.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTreatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in patients who have relapsed from anthracycline and taxane is difficult. S-1, an oral 5-FU derivative, has demonstrated a potential antitumor effect in patients with MBC. Thus, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of S-1 as second-line chemotherapy MBC patients in a phase II trial.
methodsThe study was conducted at seven centers in China and enrolled MBC patients who had previously relapsed from one chemotherapy regimen. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point. The treatment schedule involved the administration of S-1 at a standard dose based on the body surface area (BSA) in 28-day cycles with consecutive administration followed by a 14-day rest, as follows: 40 mg twice daily if BSA < 1.25 m(2); 50 mg twice daily if 1.25 m(2) ≤ BSA ≥ 1.5 m(2); and 60 mg twice daily if BSA > 1.5 m(2).
resultsThirty-three patients were included in the analysis. S-1 demonstrated moderate efficacy with a PFS of 3.3 months, a response rate of 33.3%, and a disease control rate of 72.7%. The treatment was well-tolerated with mild-to-moderate toxicity. Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 4 patients (2 with hyperbilirubinemia, 1 with anorexia, and 1 with vomiting). Grade 4 AEs were not observed.
conclusionS-1 demonstrated encouraging efficacy and safety in a prospective trial as second-line treatment in MBC patients. All AEs were manageable; however, bilirubin monitoring is recommended during treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25932284PMC4402931W2403387385What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.