Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25932284›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015

Phase II multi-center clinical study on using S-1 to treat advanced breast cancer after resistance to anthracycline and taxane drugs in Chinese patients.

Peng Yuan, Li-Jun Di, Wei Liu, Dong-Gui Wan, Hong Dai, Zhong-Sheng Tong, Feng Du, Bing-He Xu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Peng YuanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College China.
Li-Jun DiDepartment of Breast Cancer, Beijing Cancer Hospital China.
Wei LiuDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University China.
Dong-Gui WanDepartment of TCM Oncology China-Japan Friendship Hospital China.
Hong DaiDepartment of Oncology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Attached To The Capital Medical University China.
Zhong-Sheng TongDepartment of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital China.
Feng DuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College China.
Bing-He XuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNBeijing Chao-Yang Hospital · CNChina-Japan Friendship Hospital · CNHebei Medical University · CNPeking University · CNTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in patients who have relapsed from anthracycline and taxane is difficult. S-1, an oral 5-FU derivative, has demonstrated a potential antitumor effect in patients with MBC. Thus, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of S-1 as second-line chemotherapy MBC patients in a phase II trial.

methodsThe study was conducted at seven centers in China and enrolled MBC patients who had previously relapsed from one chemotherapy regimen. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point. The treatment schedule involved the administration of S-1 at a standard dose based on the body surface area (BSA) in 28-day cycles with consecutive administration followed by a 14-day rest, as follows: 40 mg twice daily if BSA < 1.25 m(2); 50 mg twice daily if 1.25 m(2) ≤ BSA ≥ 1.5 m(2); and 60 mg twice daily if BSA > 1.5 m(2).

resultsThirty-three patients were included in the analysis. S-1 demonstrated moderate efficacy with a PFS of 3.3 months, a response rate of 33.3%, and a disease control rate of 72.7%. The treatment was well-tolerated with mild-to-moderate toxicity. Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 4 patients (2 with hyperbilirubinemia, 1 with anorexia, and 1 with vomiting). Grade 4 AEs were not observed.

conclusionS-1 demonstrated encouraging efficacy and safety in a prospective trial as second-line treatment in MBC patients. All AEs were manageable; however, bilirubin monitoring is recommended during treatment.

Indexed as

chemotherapyMetastatic breast cancerS-1

Identifiers

PMID25932284
PMCPMC4402931
OpenAlexW2403387385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.