ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Prognostic role of vascular endothelial growth factor in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Membrane-derived particles shed by PSMA-positive cells function as pro-angiogenic stimuli in tumors.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023Article
- Article
- Association Between VEGF Expression and Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Several Tumors-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Targeting Angiogenesis in Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Anti-Cancer Effects of Green Tea Polyphenols Against Prostate Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Evaluation of VEGF and PEDF in prostate cancer: A preliminary study in serum and biopsies.Oncology letters · 2018Article
- Article
- Article
- Microvascular density and immunohistochemical expression of VEGF, VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 in benign prostatic hyperplasia, high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer.Central European journal of urology · 2016Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to perform a meta-analysis and literature review on the predictive role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in prostate cancer. A detailed literature search was performed using PubMed and Embase databases for related research publications written in English. Methodological quality of the studies was also evaluated. Data was collected from studies comparing overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), biomedical failure (BF) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with elevated VEGF levels and those having lower levels. The hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the strength of associations. A total of 12 studies (n = 1,737) were included in this meta-analysis (4 for OS, 3 for CSS, 2 for DFS, 4 for BF, and 4 for PFS). For OS, DFS and PFS, the pooled HR for VEGF was not statistically significant at 1.30 (95% CI, 0.74-2.29), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.57-1.13) and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.93-1.16), respectively. However, for CSS and BF, the pooled HR was 2.32 (95% CI, 1.20-4.46) and 1.30 (95% CI, 1.06-1.59), respectively. Our results demonstrate that VEGF may have a critical prognostic value in patients with prostatic cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25932165PMC4402812What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.