ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Meta-analysis of the clinical application on gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy in China.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of a new gasless method and the conventional COUpdates in surgery · 2021Trial
- Comparison of the effects of spinal epidural and general anesthesia on coagulation and fibrinolysis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial: VSJ Competition, 2Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe aim to perform systematic reviews of the clinical effects of the abdominal wall suspension technique in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in China.
methodsWe retrieved databases of literature on randomized controlled trials involving abdominal wall suspension laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Then, we conducted screenings, extracted data, and performed quality assessment and meta-analysis.
resultsWe analyzed 611 patients. Our analysis showed that the abdominal wall suspension group compared to the traditional group had reduced length of hospital stay (SMD = -0.91, 95% CI = -1.76~-0.06, P = 0.04), had shortened postoperative first exhaust time (SMD = -0.65, 95% CI = -1.11~-0.20, P = 0.005), and had diminished incidence of postoperative complications (P < 0.001), which decreased the cost of hospitalization.
conclusionsApplication of abdominal wall suspension endoscopic technique can significantly speed up the rehabilitation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients; therefore, it is worthy of further research and clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25932097PMC4402744What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.