Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25931995›Full record

ReviewIntestinal research2015

Epigenetic alterations in inflammatory bowel disease and cancer.

Joo Mi Yi, Tae Oh Kim

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Intestinal research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Role of diet and nutrition in inflammatory bowel disease.World journal of experimental medicine · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Epigenetic modulation of intestinal NaAmerican journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joo Mi YiResearch Institute, Dongnam Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences (DIRAMS), Busan, Korea.
Tae Oh KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Inje University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overwhelming evidences supports the idea that inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is caused by a complex interplay between genetic alterations of multiple genes and an aberrant interaction with environmental factors. There is growing evidence that epigenetic factors can play a significant part in the pathogenesis of IBD. Significant effort has been invested in uncovering genetic and epigenetic factors, which may increase the risk of IBD, but progress has been slow, and few IBD-specific factors have been detected so far. It has been known for decades that DNA methylation is the most well studied epigenetic modification, and analysis of DNA methylation is leading to a new generation of cancer biomarkers. Therefore, in this review, we summarize the role of DNA methylation alteration in IBD pathogenesis, and discuss specific genes or genetic loci using recent molecular technology advances. Here, we suggest that DNA methylation should be studied in depth to understand the molecular pathways of IBD pathogenesis, and discuss epigenetic studies of IBD that may have a significant impact on the field of IBD research.

Indexed as

DNA methylationEpigenomicsInflammatory bowel diseasesNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID25931995
PMCPMC4414752
OpenAlexW2011689007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.