ArticlePopulation health metrics2015
The County Health Rankings: rationale and methods.
Article in Population health metrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 189 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
189 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 379 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of screening for social risks on OBGYN patients and providers: A systematic review of current evidence and key gaps.Journal of the National Medical Association · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The prevalence of harmful traditional umbilical cord care practices and associated factors in newborns: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2026Review
- Association Between Various Metrics of the Rural Food Environment and Diabetes and Obesity.Preventing chronic disease · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal Modeling of Premature Mortality in Mississippi: A County-Level Analysis of Years of Potential Life Lost, 2015-2025.Preventing chronic disease · 2026Article
- Virginia's inpatient mental healthcare geography post SB260.Health policy OPEN · 2026Article
- Characterizing Oral Microbiome and Periodontal Disease in Oral HPV-Positive (COMP-HPV) individuals with HIV: an observational longitudinal study protocol.BMC oral health · 2026Observational
- Application of the Population Health Institute Model of Health for Identifying Cancer Catchment Area Priorities.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2026Article
- A social determinants-based county-level cardiovascular mortality index to identify high-risk counties in the USA.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- The Impact of Alteplase Coverage on Health Equity for the Treatment of Ischemic Stroke in the USA: A Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Applied health economics and health policy · 2025Article
- Article
- Stability and Volatility in the Contextual Predictors of Working-Age Mortality in the United States.Journal of health and social behavior · 2025Article
- Geographic variation in Medicare Advantage nonemergency medical transportation benefits 2020-2024.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- The Covid-19 hospitalization risk associated with air pollution in New York state counties after the 2023 Quebec wildfires.Journal of public health research · 2025Article
- Effects of extreme air pollution and El Niño Southern Oscillation on insufficient sleep: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Observational
- Incidence of Frailty, Dementia, and Disability Among Community-Living Older Americans According to County-Level Disadvantage.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- Social determinants of health and type 2 diabetes in Asia.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2025Review
- Introducing social determinants of health to the Alzheimer's Disease Research Center network: Development and implementation in the Uniform Data Set.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Associations between social capital and screening mammography among older U.S. women.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
- Social Determinants of Health in the Development of Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic Syndrome.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
129 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnnually since 2010, the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation have produced the County Health Rankings-a "population health checkup" for the nation's over 3,000 counties. The purpose of this paper is to review the background and rationale for the Rankings, explain in detail the methods we use to create the health rankings in each state, and discuss the strengths and limitations associated with ranking the health of communities.
methodsWe base the Rankings on a conceptual model of population health that includes both health outcomes (mortality and morbidity) and health factors (health behaviors, clinical care, social and economic factors, and the physical environment). Data for over 30 measures available at the county level are assembled from a number of national sources. Z-scores are calculated for each measure, multiplied by their assigned weights, and summed to create composite measure scores. Composite scores are then ordered and counties are ranked from best to worst health within each state.
resultsHealth outcomes and related health factors vary significantly within states, with over two-fold differences between the least healthy counties versus the healthiest counties for measures such as premature mortality, teen birth rates, and percent of children living in poverty. Ranking within each state depicts disparities that are not apparent when counties are ranked across the entire nation. DISCUSSION: The County Health Rankings can be used to clearly demonstrate differences in health by place, raise awareness of the many factors that influence health, and stimulate community health improvement efforts. The Rankings draws upon the human instinct to compete by facilitating comparisons between neighboring or peer counties within states. Since no population health model, or rankings based off such models, will ever perfectly describe the health of its population, we encourage users to look to local sources of data to understand more about the health of their community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.