Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25931889›Full record

ArticleUlusal cerrahi dergisi2014

The techniques of sphincter-saving extrasphincteric dissection and proximal segmental sphincteric excision in low rectal cancer surgery.

Ali Naki Yücesoy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ulusal cerrahi dergisi, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ali Naki YücesoyClinic of General Surgery, Private Batı Bahat Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo define the techniques used in lower rectal cancer surgery, by transvaginal and transperineal approach; extrasphincteric dissection, proximal segmental sphincteric excision and transsphincteric rectal resection. MATERIAL AND

methodsBetween 2007 and 2013, 7 patients (4 female, 3 male with lower rectal cancer were operated by sphincter-saving extrasphincteric disection and proksimal sphincteric excision techniques. After completion of the rectosigmoid dissection and total mesorectal excision up to the puborectal muscle level; extrasphincteric rectal dissection, transsphincteric rectal resection and ultra-low coloanal anastomosis were performed by using the transvaginal and transperineal approach in the sublevator phase of the operation.

resultsSeven patients were operated with sublevator access for lower rectal cancer. Bowel contiunity has been provided in all patients. One patient died due to surgical complications in the early postoperative period. One patient deceveloped anastomotic leakage and there were two patients with anastomotic stricture. Circumferential resection margin and tumoral perforation were found negative in all of the patients. Tumoral deposits at the distal resection line was observed in one patient.

conclusionThe techniques of sublevator rectal resection may be considered as an alternative sphincter-saving surgical method, especially in lower rectal cancer surgery.

Indexed as

Lower rectal cancerproximal segmental sphincteric excisionsphincter-saving extrasphincteric dissectiontranssphincteric rectal resection

Identifiers

PMID25931889
PMCPMC4379791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.