ArticleUlusal cerrahi dergisi2013
Evaluation of controlled prescriptions with a diagnosis of surgical intervention.
Article in Ulusal cerrahi dergisi, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDrugs subject to control (DSC) are commonly used in the preoperative, per-operative and postoperative periods. In this study, details of DSC use, that are required to be prescribed to green prescriptions (GP) or red prescriptions (RP), for a surgical diagnosis were evaluated. MATERIAL AND
methodsControlled drug prescriptions (CDP) between January to December 2009 were investigated in the archives of the Istanbul Local Health Authority. 660 CDPs indicating a surgical diagnosis were retrospectively evaluated and those prescribed by surgical departments (SD)were compared to those written by internal medicine departments (ID).
resultsSD physicians prescribed 72.7% of CDPs and 89.5% of prescriptions were for GP, and 10.5% were for RP. The physicians of SD were found to prescribe more RP than ID physicians. Most of the CDPs were written for women (58.8%) and mostly in private hospitals (40.9%). Among all the physicians, orthopedic surgeons prescribed these drugs the most (20.9%). Tramadol was the most common drug found in CDPs (55.5%).
conclusionDSCs, which have difficult prescription procedures, are used frequently in surgical interventions. The study shows that not only SD physicians, but also ID physicians prefer CDP. The study provides important clues to the usage patterns of DSCs. Recently evolving health care systems including prescriptions should use these findings obtained from the study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.