Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25931440›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2015

The Role of Gastroesophageal Reflux and Other Factors during Progression to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

William D Hazelton, Kit Curtius, John M Inadomi, Thomas L Vaughan, Rafael Meza, Joel H Rubenstein, Chin Hur, E Georg Luebeck

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Global burden and epidemiology of Barrett oesophagus and oesophageal cancer.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Alterations to the Esophageal Microbiome Associated with Progression from Barrett's Esophagus to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Evolution of Premalignant Disease.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2017
    Review
  20. A Systematic Approach to Determining the Identifiability of Multistage Carcinogenesis Models.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

William D HazeltonProgram in Computational Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. hazelton@fhcrc.org.
Kit CurtiusDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
John M InadomiDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Thomas L VaughanDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. Department of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Rafael MezaDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Joel H RubensteinDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Chin HurInstitute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Gastrointestinal Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
E Georg LuebeckProgram in Computational Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Boston Medical Center · US

Funding

PHYLOGENIES of Barrett's Esophagus LineagesP01CA091955 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI GRADY, WILLIAM MALLORY · 2002 to 2019
$35.9M
Controlling Esophageal Cancer in the US.: A Colloraborative Modeling ProjectU01CA152926 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HUR, CHIN, INADOMI, JOHN MATTHEW · 2010 to 2014
$3.9M
Esophageal Cancer from Cells to Population: A Multiscale ApproachU01CA182940 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI HUR, CHIN, INADOMI, JOHN MATTHEW · 2013 to 2017
$3.3M
Improving Gastrointestinal Disease Outcomes in Vulnerable PopulationsK24DK080941 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI INADOMI, JOHN MATTHEW · 2008 to 2019
$1.8M
ESTABLISHED INVESTIGATOR AWARD IN CANCER PREVENTION AND CONTROLK05CA124911 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI VAUGHAN, THOMAS L · 2007 to 2016
$1.6M
FHCRC High-Performance Computing ClusterS10OD020069 · OD · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI KOOPERBERG, CHARLES L · 2015 to 2015
$600k
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA124911NCI NIH HHS P01 CA091955NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152926NCI NIH HHS U01 CA182940NCI NIH HHS UO1 CA152926NCI NIH HHS UO1 CA182940NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK080941NIH HHS S10 OD020069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundU.S. esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) incidence increased over 5-fold between 1975 and 2009. Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (sGERD) elevates the risk for EAC. However, a simple calculation suggests that changes in sGERD prevalence can explain at most approximately 16% of this trend. Importantly, a mechanistic understanding of the influence of sGERD and other factors (OF) on EAC is lacking.

methodsA multiscale model was developed to estimate temporal trends for sGERD and OF, and their mechanistic role during carcinogenesis. Model calibration was to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) incidence and age-dependent sGERD data using maximum likelihood and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods.

resultsAmong men, 77.8% [95% credibility interval (CI), 64.9%-85.6%] of the incidence trend is attributable to OF, 13.4% (95% CI, 11.4%-17.3%) to sGERD, and 8.8% (95% CI, 4.2%-13.7%) to sGERD-OF interactions. Among women, 32.6% (95% CI, 27.0%-39.9%) of the trend is attributable to OF, 13.6% (95% CI, 12.5%-15.9%) to sGERD, and 47.4% (95% CI, 30.7%-64.6%) to interactions. The predicted trends were compared with historical trends for obesity, smoking, and proton pump inhibitor use. Interestingly, predicted OF cohort trends correlated most highly with median body mass index (BMI) at age 50 (r = 0.988 for men; r = 0.998 for women).

conclusionssGERD and OF mechanistically increase premalignant cell promotion, which increases EAC risk exponentially with exposure duration. IMPACT: Surveillance should target individuals with long-duration sGERD and OF exposures.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease ProgressionEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastroesophageal RefluxHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID25931440
PMCPMC4491004
OpenAlexW2034680409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.