ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2015
Correction of complex nonlinear signal response from a pixel array detector.
Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis strategies for time-resolved X-ray solution scattering at high repetition rate XFEL sources.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2026Article
- Mixed gain detector configurations for time-resolved X-ray solution scattering.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2025Article
- The ePix10k 2-megapixel hard X-ray detector at LCLS.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2020Article
- Ultrafast nonthermal heating of water initiated by an X-ray Free-Electron Laser.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Nanocrystallography measurements of early stage synthetic malaria pigment.Journal of applied crystallography · 2017Article
- The Linac Coherent Light Source.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2015Article
- X-ray detectors at the Linac Coherent Light Source.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pulsed free-electron laser light sources represent a new challenge to photon area detectors due to the intrinsic spontaneous X-ray photon generation process that makes single-pulse detection necessary. Intensity fluctuations up to 100% between individual pulses lead to high linearity requirements in order to distinguish small signal changes. In real detectors, signal distortions as a function of the intensity distribution on the entire detector can occur. Here a robust method to correct this nonlinear response in an area detector is presented for the case of exposures to similar signals. The method is tested for the case of diffuse scattering from liquids where relevant sub-1% signal changes appear on the same order as artifacts induced by the detector electronics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.